kent — CS2 Stats
76561198881485510[U:1:921219782]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 8 median | Level 9 median | vs Level 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 49.5% | 47.2% | 49.0% | meets |
| Shot accuracy | 14.1% | 12.3% | 13.1% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.08 | meets |
| Match win rate | 48.0% | 46.3% | 46.9% | above |
Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 29 | 16–13 | 55% | 0.03 | |
| C | 16 | 7–9 | 44% | 0.01 | |
| S | 12 | 8–4 | 67% | 0.03 | |
| D | 8 | 1–7 | 13% | 0.02 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.03 | |
| office | B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | 0.09 |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.02 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.01 | |
| stronghold | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.07 |
| alpine | — | 3 | 3–0 | 100% | 0.05 |
| warden | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.10 |
| poseidon | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.11 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 35 | 46% | 1.15 | 16.3 |
| Dust2 | 24 | 50% | 1.11 | 15.0 |
| Ancient | 18 | 72% | 1.16 | 17.7 |
| Nuke | 12 | 42% | 0.97 | 15.8 |
| Overpass | 11 | 27% | 0.92 | 15.2 |
| Inferno | 9 | 67% | 1.12 | 15.9 |
| Train | 4 | 50% | 1.07 | 15.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 39.3681% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 39% | 31 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 16% | 29 Mar → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.07 | 30% | 23 Mar → | ||
| office | 13–6 | 0.27 | 38% | 21 Mar → | |
| 3–13 | -0.07 | 24% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.03 | 16% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 6 Mar → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 3 Mar → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.08 | 16% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 35% | 2 Mar → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.04 | 22% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 24 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 28% | 23 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.14 | 19% | 18 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 24% | 16 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 14% | 14 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.10 | 22% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 30% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 9 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 25% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 19% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 25% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 30% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 31% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 3 Feb → | ||
| office | 11–13 | 0.03 | 30% | 3 Feb → | |
| warden | 7–13 | 0.16 | 19% | 1 Feb → | |
| poseidon | 2–9 | -0.11 | 17% | 31 Jan → | |
| 13–4 | 0.17 | 23% | 31 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 35% | 31 Jan → | ||
| stronghold | 13–3 | 0.17 | 19% | 31 Jan → | |
| poseidon | 9–3 | 0.07 | 19% | 31 Jan → | |
| 12–16 | 0.09 | 22% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 21% | 29 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.09 | 22% | 28 Jan → | ||
| stronghold | 11–13 | 0.00 | 11% | 28 Jan → | |
| office | 13–3 | 0.04 | 15% | 28 Jan → | |
| 13–4 | -0.05 | 14% | 27 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 11% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 27% | 26 Jan → | ||
| alpine | 13–9 | 0.08 | 16% | 26 Jan → | |
| alpine | 11–3 | 0.05 | 36% | 26 Jan → | |
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 20% | 26 Jan → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.02 | 16% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 29% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 21% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 1–7 | -0.05 | 33% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 13% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 10% | 24 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 20% | 24 Jan → | ||
| stronghold | 5–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 24 Jan → | |
| 15–15 | 0.14 | 24% | 23 Jan → | ||
| warden | 13–11 | 0.04 | 21% | 23 Jan → | |
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 15% | 23 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 26% | 23 Jan → | ||
| alpine | 13–6 | 0.03 | 22% | 22 Jan → | |
| 13–5 | -0.06 | 8% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 18% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 27% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.00 | 25% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 22 Jan → | ||
| office | 13–5 | 0.11 | 28% | 21 Jan → | |
| office | 8–13 | 0.02 | 28% | 21 Jan → | |
| office | 12–12 | 0.04 | 28% | 20 Jan → | |
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 30% | 19 Jan → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 16% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 30% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 33% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 31% | 17 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 33% | 17 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 29% | 17 Jan → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.06 | 22% | 16 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 14 Jan → | ||
| 5–11 | -0.04 | 30% | 14 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 14 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 14 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 35% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.00 | 15% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 30% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 31% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 29% | 12 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 34% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 28% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.04 | 35% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.06 | 37% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 23% | 7 Jan → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.11 | 20% | 7 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 20% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 26% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 27% | 5 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.11 | 30% | 5 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.