ぷMR BOB NOIAぷ — CS2 Stats
76561198874395373[U:1:914129645]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 44.7% | 52.8% | 8.0% short |
| Shot accuracy | 15.3% | 13.7% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.09 short |
| Match win rate | 39.4% | 49.2% | 9.8% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 26 | 9–17 | 35% | -0.00 | |
| B | 26 | 12–14 | 46% | -0.00 | |
| C | 23 | 9–14 | 39% | -0.00 | |
| D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | -0.01 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.04 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.00 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 53 | 58% | 1.38 | 17.4 |
| Inferno | 31 | 71% | 1.26 | 18.7 |
| Dust2 | 31 | 55% | 1.22 | 18.7 |
| Ancient | 20 | 55% | 1.14 | 15.7 |
| Anubis | 8 | 50% | 0.89 | 14.6 |
| Cache | 8 | 25% | 1.04 | 18.5 |
| Overpass | 4 | 25% | 0.84 | 13.5 |
| Vertigo | 3 | 67% | 0.89 | 15.3 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.8647% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 14% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 33% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 23% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 5% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.03 | 18% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 28% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 30% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.06 | 29% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 20% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.09 | 25% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.03 | 31% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 19% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 14% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 22% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 16% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 9–0 | 0.01 | 13% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 36% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.06 | 38% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 36% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 12% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.05 | 19% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.05 | 22% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.04 | 22% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 27% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 36% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 14% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.15 | 25% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 1–10 | 0.03 | 29% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 28% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 27% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.00 | 26% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 25% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 19% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 25% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 17–19 | 0.01 | 23% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.04 | 32% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.00 | 18% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 16–19 | -0.06 | 27% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 29% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.13 | 41% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 23% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.08 | 23% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 13% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 14% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 2–9 | 0.03 | 25% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 14% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.00 | 26% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 12% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.01 | 22% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 18% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 33% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.02 | 30% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 19% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.14 | 31% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.03 | 20% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 5–3 | 0.03 | 100% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 16% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 25% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 26% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 29% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 28% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 19% | 18 Jun → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.00 | 26% | 18 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 26% | 18 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 17% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 23% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 23% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 19% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 16% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.06 | 22% | 11 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 20% | 11 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 10% | 10 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.08 | 13% | 10 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 10 Jun → | ||
| 22–18 | 0.01 | 24% | 9 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 21% | 9 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 9 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.