☠ — CS2 Stats
76561198874389412[U:1:914123684]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 7 median | Level 8 median | vs Level 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 38.5% | 46.2% | 47.2% | 8.7% short |
| Shot accuracy | 13.1% | 12.5% | 12.3% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.10 | 1.06 | 1.07 | above |
| Match win rate | 48.1% | 45.9% | 46.3% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 28 | 17–11 | 61% | 0.03 | |
| S | 19 | 14–5 | 74% | 0.05 | |
| A | 14 | 8–6 | 57% | 0.05 | |
| B | 13 | 7–6 | 54% | 0.02 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | 0.00 | |
| B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | -0.01 | |
| B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| office | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.01 |
| poseidon | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.10 |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.03 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 46 | 54% | 1.10 | 14.2 |
| Anubis | 37 | 65% | 1.09 | 15.9 |
| Dust2 | 33 | 67% | 1.06 | 15.4 |
| Inferno | 32 | 44% | 1.00 | 15.6 |
| Vertigo | 30 | 57% | 1.09 | 16.8 |
| Nuke | 16 | 62% | 1.16 | 21.5 |
| Ancient | 15 | 27% | 1.13 | 18.9 |
| Train | 1 | 100% | 0.95 | 19.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.667% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.00 | 23% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 19–17 | 0.00 | 12% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 12% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.00 | 18% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 20% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 25% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 13% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.09 | 13% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 16% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–0 | 0.07 | 4% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 24% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 20% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 11% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 16% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 21% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.07 | 14% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.10 | 12% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 15% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 17% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 20% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.12 | 15% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 11% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 27% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 11% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 10% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 28% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 16% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.08 | 15% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.05 | 21% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 18% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 27% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.10 | 22% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.07 | 29% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.15 | 19% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.01 | 14% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 18% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 27% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.17 | 9% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.14 | 26% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 21% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.12 | 0% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 17% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.13 | 19% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.22 | 32% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 20% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.11 | 18% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 23% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.13 | 22% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.02 | 8% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.07 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.04 | 29% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.12 | 8% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.00 | 11% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 19% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 12% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.13 | 27% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.08 | 29% | 15 Aug → | ||
| office | 6–13 | 0.05 | 21% | 14 Aug → | |
| 13–3 | 0.11 | 16% | 14 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 4–9 | -0.10 | 16% | 14 Aug → | |
| 2–9 | -0.14 | 28% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.13 | 14% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 24% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.03 | 23% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.13 | 20% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 18% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.04 | 13% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.09 | 19% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.16 | 39% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 30% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 31% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.03 | 13% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 21% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 10% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 10% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| office | 11–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 7 Aug → | |
| 8–2 | -0.02 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 45% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.07 | 18% | 7 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.