Kangaroo Monkey pls no cheat

Kangaroo Monkey pls no cheat — CS2 Stats

76561198870211263[U:1:909945535]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

841Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
725Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,652Purple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6219 of 11872 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKangaroo Monkey pls no ch…FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,652 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time541ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 9–2
133Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2281436%0.02
mirageA1911858%0.04
nukeB179853%0.02
ancientB126650%0.02
anubisA95456%0.03
infernoC94544%0.01
cacheS65183%0.05
office43175%0.02
vertigo1010%0.00
debris1010%0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,749Lifetime kills
1.48K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
2,031Matches
41.6%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
5,363MVPs
725Hours (in match)
1,363Bombs planted
600Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,086dust2
1,827inferno
972office
909nuke
878cbble
772vertigo
474train
19lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
83.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2854%1.1716.5
Dust22352%1.2017.9
Ancient1947%1.1318.6
Inferno1155%1.1817.4
Nuke743%1.2913.4
Anubis714%1.0519.1
Overpass20%0.8315.0
Cache250%0.9414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
535msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
5.47HE damage / grenade
10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4841% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8013% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–130.0411%27 Aug
anubis13–50.0713%27 Aug
inferno5–130.0027%26 Aug
dust210–30.0526%26 Aug
mirage9–20.2415%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.047%24 Aug
anubis10–130.0411%23 Aug
dust213–90.0312%21 Aug
dust29–130.0010%20 Aug
dust210–130.0614%20 Aug
ancient12–4-0.0225%20 Aug
nuke13–160.0321%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0813%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0212%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0311%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.0314%18 Aug
dust28–130.0211%18 Aug
nuke13–90.0715%18 Aug
office13–40.0413%18 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0121%17 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0312%16 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0014%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0113%16 Aug
dust213–50.1514%16 Aug
cache13–40.0418%16 Aug
mirage3–6-0.1014%16 Aug
dust213–70.0616%16 Aug
anubis13–80.026%16 Aug
dust213–70.028%15 Aug
dust213–160.0421%14 Aug
cache13–110.1118%13 Aug
ancient13–80.068%13 Aug
dust213–50.0718%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0633%12 Aug
mirage11–130.0011%12 Aug
mirage13–100.1015%12 Aug
mirage11–130.0711%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0113%12 Aug
cache13–60.0923%12 Aug
mirage12–160.0415%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0012%10 Aug
dust213–40.0217%9 Aug
dust27–130.0115%9 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0110%9 Aug
cache13–60.0327%8 Aug
ancient13–70.0014%8 Aug
dust26–130.0038%7 Aug
ancient6–130.1017%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0314%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0615%5 Aug
ancient6–130.0121%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.058%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0512%4 Aug
dust213–80.0119%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0419%3 Aug
inferno13–50.0619%3 Aug
dust28–130.0414%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.069%3 Aug
dust24–13-0.107%3 Aug
ancient5–110.0215%3 Aug
anubis13–80.048%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0821%2 Aug
cache13–50.067%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.036%31 Jul
nuke13–30.0611%31 Jul
anubis13–80.048%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0717%31 Jul
anubis13–110.079%31 Jul
vertigo4–130.0021%31 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0417%31 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0115%30 Jul
dust214–160.0617%30 Jul
office13–60.0317%27 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0115%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.018%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0213%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0610%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0212%24 Jul
anubis16–190.0516%24 Jul
mirage11–130.0623%23 Jul
debris2–50.2018%23 Jul
nuke9–00.1914%23 Jul
ancient13–60.0826%23 Jul
mirage13–40.0418%23 Jul
mirage7–130.1116%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0015%22 Jul
nuke9–130.0425%22 Jul
inferno13–100.0621%22 Jul
mirage13–110.018%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0119%20 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0529%20 Jul
office13–70.0228%20 Jul
inferno10–130.0019%17 Jul
dust213–16-0.0117%17 Jul
cache7–13-0.0416%17 Jul
mirage16–140.0814%17 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0214%17 Jul
inferno15–190.0312%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0125%16 Jul
office6–130.0030%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →