Catty — CS2 Stats

76561198855433119[U:1:895167391]

2,849Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.1 Learning

Premier CS Rating8,556Light Blue band · top ~61.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#38867 of 52742 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver Elite Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36

Positioning46

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–55Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6

Aggression6.0

Utility5.0

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6

Positioning4.6

Utility5.0

Mechanics2.3

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time561ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy12.9%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–0Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 39% over 31

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	31	12–19	39%	-0.03
dust2	C	20	8–12	40%	-0.02
nuke	A	14	8–6	57%	0.00
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.02
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.03
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches

56%Win rate

0.66Avg K/D

60.6ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	67%	0.69	11.7
Inferno	2	100%	0.57	10.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.63	12.0
Dust2	1	100%	1.00	9.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.57	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy

31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.6%Spray accuracy

60.4%Counter-strafing

11.4°Preaim

563msReaction time

36.2%T opening success

33.5%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

1.5%Flash assists

8.68HE damage / grenade

3.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.3818% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.644 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.2466% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.06	10%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	5%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	9%	29 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	17%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.04	10%	29 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.06	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.07	12%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	8%	26 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	13%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	9%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	7%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	30%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	14%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	8%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	9%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	7%	23 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.03	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	19%	22 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	12%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.10	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.03	6%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	20%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	10%	21 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	9%	21 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	3%	20 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	15%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	5%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.02	17%	18 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.05	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	5%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	15%	17 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.00	18%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	24%	16 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	26%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.06	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.09	11%	15 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	11%	14 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.02	8%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.01	12%	12 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	12%	12 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	18%	11 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	7%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	20%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–0	-0.01	14%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	8%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	11%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	12%	30 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	4%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	17%	29 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	12%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	10%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.04	8%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.00	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	5%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	12%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	11%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.01	8%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	19%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	15%	26 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	10%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	8%	25 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.01	10%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	6%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.08	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	6%	24 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	11%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	14%	21 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.03	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.07	22%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.04	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	9%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.10	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	8%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	14%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	13%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	11%	18 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	11%	17 Jul →