XantosONLINE — CS2 Stats
76561198840189611[U:1:879923883]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 5 median | Level 6 median | vs Level 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 46.7% | 44.0% | 44.7% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 4.1% | 11.6% | 11.9% | 7.8% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.04 | meets |
| Match win rate | 50.2% | 45.1% | 45.2% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 392 | 48% | 1.12 | 17.2 |
| Ancient | 378 | 47% | 1.03 | 16.1 |
| Nuke | 320 | 59% | 1.09 | 17.2 |
| Anubis | 212 | 48% | 1.09 | 16.9 |
| Dust2 | 144 | 51% | 1.07 | 16.5 |
| Overpass | 130 | 53% | 1.13 | 16.4 |
| Mirage | 116 | 48% | 0.95 | 15.2 |
| Train | 96 | 46% | 1.08 | 16.4 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.0212% — below the 40% mark we flag