Stippy stips

Stippy stips — CS2 Stats

76561198837721452[U:1:877455724]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

458Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
567Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,710Blue band · top ~45.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24235 of 34684 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate55.1%41.7%44.1%above
Shot accuracy4.8%8.8%11.4%6.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.810.971.030.22 short
Match win rate37.5%43.8%45.2%7.7% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStippy stipsPREMIER11,710 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning49
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47458Last 10047%Win rateWLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression4.5
Utility4.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.9
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time592ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–2
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB20101050%-0.00
cacheA169756%0.01
dust2C167944%-0.01
infernoC1661038%-0.01
nukeB137654%0.01
ancientC104640%0.00
anubisA53260%-0.01
vertigo41325%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,148Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
842Matches
37.5%Match win rate
55.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Blue band
4.8%Shot accuracy
1,635MVPs
573Hours (in match)
426Bombs planted
165Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,440dust2
1,044inferno
590nuke
100vertigo
33train
13italy
1cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
59%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
70.2ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%0.7812.6
Dust2580%1.1316.6
Nuke475%1.3413.8
Anubis20%0.9014.5
Inferno2100%0.7210.0
Ancient10%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
583msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.97HE damage / grenade
4.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.772% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–00.0917%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0522%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0023%26 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0224%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1022%24 Aug
cache14–16-0.0119%24 Aug
cache6–13-0.0013%20 Aug
ancient5–50.0213%20 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0412%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0021%20 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0224%18 Aug
dust28–130.0320%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0415%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0717%17 Aug
inferno13–8-0.018%17 Aug
inferno16–140.0510%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0917%16 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0213%16 Aug
nuke13–100.1120%16 Aug
nuke13–50.0914%15 Aug
dust213–100.0412%15 Aug
nuke13–00.0530%13 Aug
mirage7–130.0117%13 Aug
ancient6–130.0114%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0518%12 Aug
mirage13–30.0719%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.029%12 Aug
mirage13–10.0417%12 Aug
ancient13–70.0920%12 Aug
ancient13–20.1119%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0720%11 Aug
dust27–130.0327%11 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0926%11 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0320%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.047%9 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0017%9 Aug
inferno4–7-0.1115%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0514%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0717%8 Aug
cache13–6-0.056%8 Aug
dust213–110.0621%8 Aug
dust213–10-0.036%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0315%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0015%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1221%8 Aug
inferno13–50.0214%8 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0119%7 Aug
dust212–12-0.0015%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0524%7 Aug
nuke13–90.0119%7 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0016%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0529%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0111%6 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0026%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0135%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0021%5 Aug
dust212–120.0317%5 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0210%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0119%5 Aug
inferno13–70.0815%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0128%4 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0328%4 Aug
cache16–14-0.0517%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0113%4 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0344%4 Aug
vertigo9–130.0021%4 Aug
anubis13–100.0115%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0229%3 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0624%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0613%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0421%3 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0220%3 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0214%3 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0115%2 Aug
mirage12–120.0520%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.1013%2 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0518%2 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0824%31 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0425%31 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0317%30 Jul
cache13–3-0.0129%30 Jul
cache8–130.0625%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0729%30 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0320%29 Jul
cache12–120.0424%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0419%29 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0413%29 Jul
dust213–40.0344%28 Jul
nuke12–120.0230%28 Jul
mirage4–60.0229%28 Jul
mirage13–20.0921%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0111%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0226%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0120%26 Jul
cache13–00.1132%26 Jul
cache13–8-0.0125%25 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0118%25 Jul
cache13–60.0116%25 Jul
cache13–90.1134%25 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0521%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →