Chbel0 — CS2 Stats

76561198828400924[U:1:868135196]✓ No bans

609Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,401Purple band · top ~14.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19151 of 39915 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChbel0FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,401 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning46
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateLWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.4
Utility3.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.6
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–4
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA24141058%-0.02
infernoC2281436%-0.02
ancientC125742%-0.02
nukeS129375%0.03
dust2D93633%-0.03
anubisB63350%-0.02
overpass43175%-0.01
train330100%-0.00
cache220100%0.07
grail220100%-0.01
vertigo21150%-0.05
whistle110100%0.07
palais110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
55%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
90.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage714%0.589.1
Ancient667%1.1019.7
Anubis580%1.0216.0
Nuke580%1.1014.4
Inferno425%1.0413.3
Vertigo367%1.0515.0
Train1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
620msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
12.20HE damage / grenade
3.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4213 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.349% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0719%2 Jun
anubis13–1-0.0317%2 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0316%2 Jun
dust216–12-0.0421%2 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0617%17 May
mirage16–12-0.0315%17 May
inferno10–13-0.069%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0511%11 May
ancient9–130.0421%11 May
inferno13–60.0119%11 May
anubis4–13-0.0414%11 May
nuke3–13-0.0613%11 May
mirage13–20.0226%11 May
mirage13–8-0.0315%7 May
overpass6–130.0228%7 May
mirage6–13-0.088%7 May
nuke13–9-0.0011%7 May
anubis13–90.0214%5 May
ancient13–50.0325%4 May
mirage13–6-0.0317%4 May
ancient11–13-0.0125%4 May
overpass16–14-0.0813%4 May
nuke13–50.0830%3 May
ancient13–90.0327%3 May
inferno5–13-0.0618%3 May
cache13–20.0726%3 May
cache13–30.0722%3 May
anubis13–60.0014%16 Apr
dust26–13-0.0623%16 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0020%16 Apr
inferno13–70.0421%16 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0436%16 Apr
mirage13–40.1023%16 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0324%16 Apr
mirage13–4-0.027%12 Apr
mirage9–13-0.1014%12 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0521%12 Apr
ancient7–13-0.124%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0724%12 Apr
mirage0–13-0.1231%11 Apr
mirage13–30.0117%2 Mar
dust213–80.0425%2 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0419%2 Mar
inferno13–10.0713%2 Mar
mirage13–50.0024%2 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0811%20 Sept
mirage13–100.0119%20 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0218%7 Sept
nuke13–40.1610%6 Sept
mirage0–4-0.0260%6 Sept
dust213–160.0220%6 Sept
inferno11–130.0127%6 Sept
nuke13–80.0923%6 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0519%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0523%30 Aug
train13–10-0.0021%30 Aug
mirage13–100.0113%30 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0420%30 Aug
grail13–5-0.048%30 Aug
grail13–40.0212%30 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1121%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0016%22 Aug
inferno16–13-0.016%22 Aug
nuke13–90.048%22 Aug
train13–110.0211%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0617%20 Aug
mirage15–150.0529%20 Aug
ancient14–160.0110%19 Aug
ancient13–10-0.058%19 Aug
nuke9–130.0211%5 May
inferno12–120.0021%5 May
inferno8–13-0.0113%5 May
dust214–16-0.0311%24 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0311%24 Apr
dust211–13-0.0121%23 Apr
inferno13–10.0421%25 Jan
train13–5-0.0314%25 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0114%25 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0115%25 Jan
mirage16–12-0.0214%25 Jan
nuke13–50.028%25 Jan
inferno5–9-0.0511%25 Jan
inferno6–9-0.0112%23 Jan
nuke9–30.0616%23 Jan
overpass9–70.0716%23 Jan
whistle9–60.0724%23 Jan
palais9–60.0126%23 Jan
vertigo9–5-0.0312%23 Jan
vertigo4–9-0.078%23 Jan
inferno9–60.0012%23 Jan
inferno4–9-0.1030%23 Jan
inferno5–9-0.0625%23 Jan
nuke9–60.013%23 Jan
mirage2–130.0321%18 Jan
mirage13–60.0213%14 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0226%14 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0418%14 Jan
inferno13–10.1017%14 Jan
dust23–13-0.0432%14 Jan
dust213–9-0.058%11 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →