EinsteinPeek // PepeLino — CS2 Stats

76561198823690125[U:1:863424397]

977Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,016Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3068 of 22036 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEinsteinPeek // PepeLinoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,016 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning69
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateLWWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression10.0
Utility7.2
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 74% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 74% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.9
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time550ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 13–7
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10dust2Weakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25141156%0.05
infernoA1811761%0.04
dust2B136746%0.02
nukeB126650%0.07
ancientA116555%0.01
overpassS108280%0.08
anubisA53260%0.03
cache330100%0.10
train220100%0.05
vertigo110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

333Matches
54%Win rate
1.50Avg K/D
78.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2245%1.0616.7
Anubis1233%1.0016.7
Dust21233%0.8912.1
Inferno1155%1.4717.0
Ancient1060%1.1516.4
Vertigo650%0.9514.8
Nuke367%1.1714.7
Overpass1100%1.4426.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
551msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
73.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
11.56HE damage / grenade
10.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–160.0512%26 Aug
anubis13–40.1329%19 Aug
inferno13–10.0420%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0517%19 Aug
dust213–100.0319%13 Aug
nuke13–20.1326%11 Aug
cache13–60.0824%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0114%11 Aug
cache13–80.0728%8 Aug
inferno8–130.1321%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0518%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0611%8 Aug
nuke13–70.2427%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0324%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0217%7 Aug
mirage13–50.1228%7 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0328%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0717%7 Aug
dust213–2-0.0515%7 Aug
mirage13–90.1223%7 Aug
inferno14–160.1419%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0131%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0123%7 Aug
nuke11–130.1018%7 Aug
ancient13–90.069%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0624%5 Aug
cache13–100.1411%25 Jul
ancient12–120.0416%25 Jul
train13–30.0727%25 Jul
mirage3–130.1036%24 Jun
nuke13–80.0417%20 Jun
inferno13–100.0627%20 Jun
nuke13–10.118%20 Jun
dust25–130.0118%20 Jun
ancient3–130.0111%20 Jun
ancient2–80.0228%27 May
nuke9–13-0.0130%27 May
mirage6–130.0420%27 May
mirage6–130.0713%17 May
overpass15–150.0617%9 May
anubis13–100.0410%9 May
dust26–13-0.0115%9 May
mirage13–90.1020%4 May
dust29–130.0019%4 May
mirage13–90.0616%4 May
mirage13–50.0835%4 May
mirage13–60.0221%4 May
dust23–13-0.068%4 May
ancient13–10-0.0117%26 Apr
inferno13–90.0617%26 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0419%26 Apr
train13–20.0325%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0416%25 Apr
nuke13–100.1037%25 Apr
ancient8–1-0.0212%25 Apr
inferno6–13-0.049%25 Apr
overpass13–30.2025%25 Apr
mirage13–60.0618%25 Apr
nuke7–130.1030%25 Apr
overpass13–30.1424%25 Apr
inferno13–80.1040%21 Apr
ancient13–20.0429%20 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0114%19 Apr
overpass13–80.0527%19 Apr
dust213–60.0922%15 Apr
overpass13–80.0215%15 Apr
dust213–70.0122%15 Apr
inferno13–110.0817%9 Apr
vertigo13–50.1118%9 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0013%1 Apr
dust29–13-0.0822%29 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0211%29 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0312%29 Mar
mirage11–130.0916%27 Mar
overpass13–70.0714%27 Mar
mirage13–30.1932%27 Mar
inferno13–70.0731%27 Mar
dust26–130.1417%27 Mar
mirage13–100.0413%27 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0419%27 Mar
inferno13–110.0721%26 Mar
nuke1–9-0.1521%26 Mar
overpass9–40.0416%26 Mar
inferno9–30.0619%26 Mar
inferno13–110.0110%26 Mar
mirage13–30.0324%26 Mar
dust213–10.0421%26 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0422%24 Mar
mirage13–50.0914%24 Mar
dust211–13-0.0414%23 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0010%23 Mar
dust213–70.1326%23 Mar
inferno13–00.0827%20 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0917%20 Mar
nuke13–50.2020%13 Mar
overpass13–110.0819%13 Mar
overpass13–20.2118%13 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0326%13 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0116%2 Mar
mirage10–130.0424%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →