Netinho de Paula — CS2 Stats
BR76561198810046908[U:1:849781180]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 52.9% | 51.9% |
| Shot accuracy | 17.8% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.47 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 54.7% | 48.7% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 anubis | A | 27 | 15–12 | 56% | 0.05 |
 cache | A | 21 | 13–8 | 62% | 0.05 |
 dust2 | C | 16 | 7–9 | 44% | 0.01 |
 mirage | A | 16 | 10–6 | 63% | 0.04 |
 overpass | B | 16 | 8–8 | 50% | 0.06 |
 inferno | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.01 |
 ancient | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anubis | 25 | 76% | 1.75 | 22.9 |
| Mirage | 22 | 55% | 1.59 | 22.4 |
| Dust2 | 21 | 52% | 1.36 | 22.1 |
| Inferno | 17 | 82% | 1.82 | 22.6 |
| Cache | 15 | 67% | 1.59 | 22.4 |
| Ancient | 8 | 62% | 1.26 | 17.9 |
| Nuke | 6 | 67% | 1.96 | 22.8 |
| Vertigo | 3 | 67% | 2.37 | 29.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.8922% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–9 | -0.00 | 19% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.10 | 26% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.05 | 19% | 25 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.12 | 29% | 12 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.12 | 24% | 12 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–11 | 0.14 | 24% | 11 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.08 | 44% | 9 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.11 | 18% | 6 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.07 | 29% | 6 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.01 | 79% | 5 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.08 | 60% | 5 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 5 Jul → | |
| anubis | 4–13 | 0.06 | 13% | 28 Jun → | |
| overpass | 8–13 | 0.04 | 17% | 28 Jun → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 27 Jun → | |
| overpass | 10–13 | -0.00 | 22% | 27 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.04 | 12% | 27 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | 0.02 | 15% | 24 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–9 | 0.09 | 24% | 20 Jun → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 18 Jun → | |
| overpass | 9–13 | -0.00 | 20% | 15 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.16 | 26% | 14 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | 0.04 | 16% | 13 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.10 | 21% | 12 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.03 | 18% | 12 Jun → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 9 Jun → | |
| cache | 7–13 | 0.07 | 48% | 9 Jun → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | 0.06 | 16% | 8 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.01 | 23% | 8 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 15–19 | -0.00 | 19% | 7 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | 0.02 | 18% | 7 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.03 | 18% | 6 Jun → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | 0.04 | 12% | 2 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | 0.04 | 18% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 1–13 | 0.03 | 12% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.06 | 26% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.17 | 24% | 29 May → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.03 | 40% | 28 May → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.09 | 14% | 28 May → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | 0.00 | 11% | 28 May → | |
| cache | 13–3 | 0.03 | 20% | 25 May → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.05 | 19% | 25 May → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | 0.12 | 15% | 25 May → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 23 May → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.01 | 26% | 23 May → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | 0.09 | 24% | 23 May → | |
| anubis | 16–19 | 0.06 | 29% | 22 May → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.05 | 21% | 21 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 21 May → | |
| overpass | 7–13 | 0.08 | 26% | 21 May → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 18 May → | |
| anubis | 12–16 | 0.03 | 27% | 18 May → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.03 | 32% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.05 | 20% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.08 | 25% | 18 May → | |
| anubis | 22–20 | 0.04 | 9% | 18 May → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 17 May → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.08 | 18% | 16 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.02 | 17% | 16 May → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 16 May → | |
| anubis | 13–16 | 0.04 | 16% | 15 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.06 | 16% | 15 May → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.06 | 25% | 14 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.05 | 18% | 14 May → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.06 | 20% | 13 May → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | 0.11 | 26% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 19–22 | 0.05 | 26% | 13 May → | |
| overpass | 11–13 | 0.14 | 20% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.09 | 18% | 10 May → | |
| anubis | 6–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.08 | 13% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.11 | 60% | 9 May → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.07 | 21% | 6 May → | |
| anubis | 19–16 | 0.05 | 18% | 6 May → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 5 May → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.08 | 24% | 5 May → | |
| overpass | 16–14 | 0.08 | 21% | 4 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.00 | 30% | 3 May → | |
| cache | 12–16 | -0.01 | 22% | 3 May → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 3 May → | |
| overpass | 8–13 | -0.00 | 19% | 2 May → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 26 Apr → | |
| overpass | 4–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 25 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–6 | 0.12 | 19% | 22 Apr → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.07 | 24% | 21 Apr → | |
| overpass | 11–13 | 0.02 | 19% | 21 Apr → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.01 | 25% | 19 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.00 | 13% | 19 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–6 | 0.09 | 26% | 19 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.08 | 20% | 18 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 9% | 18 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.10 | 25% | 17 Apr → | |
| inferno | 17–19 | -0.02 | 16% | 16 Apr → | |
| anubis | 22–20 | 0.05 | 20% | 14 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–9 | 0.06 | 21% | 14 Apr → | |
| inferno | 19–17 | 0.04 | 15% | 13 Apr → | |
| mirage | 16–12 | -0.00 | 17% | 4 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 19–15 | 0.01 | 22% | 3 Apr → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | 0.01 | 10% | 28 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.
