ekl — CS2 Stats

76561198809471163[U:1:849205435]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,765Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,283Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11649 of 35300 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,296 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning41

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–51Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8

Aggression6.1

Utility4.0

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning4.1

Utility4.0

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time567ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms

Headshot accuracy36.0%+10.6%

first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 36.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–10

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

L4Current streak

7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 0% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	30	19–11	63%	0.01
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.01
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.01
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	0.03
vertigo	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
dust2	D	7	0–7	0%	-0.03
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,051Matches

51%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

81.3ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	490	53%	1.06	16.6
Ancient	436	48%	1.02	16.0
Anubis	425	47%	1.04	16.1
Nuke	235	53%	1.09	17.0
Vertigo	213	53%	1.04	15.7
Inferno	186	51%	1.08	16.6
Overpass	130	58%	1.13	16.6
Dust2	108	43%	0.89	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

37.1%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.8%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

565msReaction time

32.4%T opening success

50.0%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

5.6%Flash assists

10.97HE damage / grenade

5.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4278 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3751% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	0–13	-0.06	80%	24 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	80%	24 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.10	57%	20 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.08	88%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	61%	20 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	9%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.07	19%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	37%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	32%	15 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	44%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	44%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	35%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	31%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	35%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.08	21%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	31%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	28%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	32%	11 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	30%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	33%	11 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	29%	10 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	44%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.13	33%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.07	24%	9 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	0.02	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	38%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.05	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	28%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	36%	4 Aug →
nuke	5–3	0.14	50%	4 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	27%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	30%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.05	24%	1 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	17%	1 Aug →
ancient	8–1	0.07	29%	1 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.06	22%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.08	21%	31 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	22%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	38%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	35%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.08	40%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.07	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	52%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.14	26%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.05	31%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–2	0.11	25%	27 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.03	28%	28 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.06	21%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.07	18%	14 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	43%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	37%	14 Jun →
vertigo	10–13	-0.00	32%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.07	21%	1 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	26%	1 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	18%	1 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	28%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	22%	30 May →
inferno	13–4	0.02	38%	29 May →
ancient	11–13	0.09	25%	29 May →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	20%	29 May →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	16%	28 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	22%	28 May →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	29%	28 May →
cache	11–1	0.01	27%	28 May →
vertigo	13–3	0.13	20%	28 May →
overpass	19–16	-0.04	25%	27 May →
overpass	10–1	0.07	27%	27 May →
mirage	22–19	-0.05	18%	26 May →
anubis	12–16	0.00	16%	24 May →
nuke	9–13	0.06	21%	24 May →
overpass	10–13	0.03	23%	24 May →
overpass	13–5	-0.01	22%	24 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	16%	21 May →
anubis	16–12	-0.00	20%	21 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	29%	21 May →
vertigo	13–1	-0.02	23%	21 May →
cache	13–4	0.09	23%	21 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	24%	21 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	36%	21 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	26%	21 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	28%	21 May →
anubis	16–19	0.01	31%	20 May →
dust2	11–13	0.05	40%	20 May →
dust2	8–13	0.04	23%	20 May →
inferno	13–7	0.04	30%	20 May →
mirage	9–13	0.06	34%	20 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	15%	20 May →
vertigo	13–2	0.05	31%	20 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	25%	19 May →
mirage	22–20	0.07	26%	19 May →
anubis	13–8	0.05	35%	19 May →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	15%	19 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	31%	19 May →
nuke	11–13	0.04	28%	17 May →