bomboclat

bomboclat — CS2 Stats

JM76561198798733149[U:1:838467421]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,071Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,826 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbomboclatFACEITLevel 9 · 1,826 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning46
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39592Last 10039%Win rateWWLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression5.9
Utility7.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time590ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 12–12
131Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 11nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC24101442%-0.01
dust2B2091145%-0.01
anubisD1441029%0.00
mirageA116555%-0.04
nukeD102820%-0.02
cacheD62433%0.00
infernoD62433%0.04
vertigo31233%0.01
train21150%0.04
overpass21150%0.02
office110100%-0.03
alpine1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,280Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage51348%1.0314.8
Ancient34855%1.0415.2
Anubis30753%1.0114.9
Dust228353%0.9514.4
Nuke14249%0.9714.6
Vertigo14152%1.1415.9
Inferno13147%0.9814.1
Overpass7739%1.0414.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
574msReaction time
22.8%T opening success
58.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
16.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.466 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7773% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0218%26 Aug
dust219–170.0114%26 Aug
ancient16–190.0014%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0713%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0814%22 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0411%22 Aug
cache13–80.1112%21 Aug
nuke13–4-0.080%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0415%18 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0420%16 Aug
ancient13–50.0925%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0912%12 Aug
train0–11-0.0526%12 Aug
dust24–13-0.0125%10 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0113%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0124%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0125%9 Aug
dust213–4-0.0013%9 Aug
dust214–160.0414%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0515%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0115%6 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0426%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0016%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.067%2 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0928%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0223%1 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0719%30 Jul
vertigo7–130.0624%30 Jul
cache7–13-0.0623%30 Jul
dust24–130.0219%29 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0432%28 Jul
cache11–5-0.0418%26 Jul
inferno0–110.0525%25 Jul
anubis12–120.1120%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0221%24 Jul
dust213–100.0520%22 Jul
inferno12–120.1317%18 Jul
dust21–13-0.1325%16 Jul
inferno6–130.0130%15 Jul
office13–9-0.0321%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0315%9 Jul
dust213–6-0.0013%8 Jul
cache11–13-0.0011%1 Jul
cache7–130.0320%1 Jul
anubis4–130.0323%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0312%27 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0822%27 Jun
mirage12–16-0.1018%25 Jun
dust29–13-0.0219%24 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0113%21 Jun
anubis13–80.1030%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0423%20 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0117%20 Jun
inferno13–110.0117%19 Jun
train13–110.1321%19 Jun
dust21–6-0.070%18 Jun
dust28–130.0627%15 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0714%14 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0714%12 Jun
ancient13–70.0311%12 Jun
ancient11–13-0.027%11 Jun
nuke4–130.0122%7 Jun
ancient5–130.0224%6 Jun
mirage5–13-0.053%6 Jun
dust213–90.0915%5 Jun
alpine0–2-0.0267%3 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0220%1 Jun
dust213–7-0.0211%1 Jun
dust22–130.0117%30 May
anubis13–2-0.0213%27 May
anubis9–130.0116%27 May
ancient13–5-0.0421%27 May
vertigo10–130.0319%26 May
mirage13–70.0622%21 May
nuke5–9-0.219%20 May
ancient13–7-0.0311%19 May
mirage13–6-0.075%19 May
anubis13–80.0714%18 May
dust213–9-0.0313%15 May
mirage5–13-0.0714%13 May
ancient17–190.0214%13 May
anubis4–13-0.0624%9 May
nuke10–130.0515%5 May
dust216–130.0626%30 Apr
ancient13–160.0122%29 Apr
overpass13–10.1119%29 Apr
dust213–110.0110%26 Apr
dust22–13-0.0821%25 Apr
overpass2–13-0.089%24 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0319%23 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0738%23 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0514%21 Apr
anubis13–90.0431%19 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0113%19 Apr
ancient13–70.0824%18 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0826%16 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0129%15 Apr
nuke10–130.1124%15 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0914%11 Apr
inferno13–50.0630%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →