donatello

donatello — CS2 Stats

76561198791179235[U:1:830913507]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

227Tracked matches33%Win rate2026Tracked since
761Hours in CS234Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,635Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15140 of 28511 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate66.3%44.1%47.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.031.09meets
Match win rate57.5%45.2%46.6%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdonatelloPREMIER17,635 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning56
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression7.5
Utility4.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.0
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time624ms+136ms
first ⅓ avg 489ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%−11.8%
first ⅓ avg 35.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–8
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37191851%0.00
dust2B23111248%0.01
infernoC125742%0.01
ancientS119282%0.02
anubisD62433%-0.04
cache42250%0.01
overpass41325%0.03
nuke31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,847Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
560Matches
57.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of Purple band
66.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,469MVPs
227Hours (in match)
605Bombs planted
97Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,248dust2
614inferno
227nuke
26vertigo
25train
24office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
640msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
5.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5265% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0025%26 Aug
ancient13–60.0440%19 Aug
dust213–100.0436%19 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0022%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0226%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0118%6 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0131%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0523%5 Aug
cache13–4-0.0318%4 Aug
dust213–80.1439%3 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0426%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0138%2 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0514%2 Aug
cache10–130.0330%2 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0313%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0838%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.017%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0317%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0027%1 Aug
mirage13–40.0211%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0422%1 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0315%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0835%31 Jul
dust211–130.0236%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0728%30 Jul
dust213–40.0320%29 Jul
dust20–5-0.0529%29 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0216%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0813%20 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0629%20 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0229%18 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0526%18 Jul
mirage1–13-0.050%10 Jul
dust22–130.0341%13 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0941%22 May
mirage1–13-0.0625%13 May
ancient13–8-0.0043%13 May
mirage13–50.0449%13 May
mirage3–130.0463%13 May
mirage13–60.0559%13 May
dust213–90.1055%12 May
inferno13–70.0451%12 May
dust210–130.0557%12 May
mirage13–100.0144%12 May
inferno13–90.1153%10 May
overpass6–13-0.0144%10 May
ancient9–20.0931%10 May
dust213–0-0.0229%10 May
inferno3–13-0.0725%10 May
dust27–20.0939%8 May
ancient13–7-0.0327%8 May
mirage1–13-0.0233%8 May
inferno3–0-0.030%8 May
cache13–20.0649%8 May
cache11–13-0.0231%8 May
dust21–13-0.0623%8 May
dust23–00.0875%8 May
anubis7–13-0.0927%7 May
overpass0–13-0.0440%7 May
dust22–13-0.0329%7 May
mirage2–13-0.0317%7 May
nuke0–6-0.130%30 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0133%30 Apr
mirage13–90.0042%27 Apr
dust213–40.0537%27 Apr
ancient13–90.1052%27 Apr
mirage0–5-0.0067%27 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0233%27 Apr
mirage5–00.0533%27 Apr
mirage3–13-0.060%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0732%26 Apr
mirage13–00.0741%26 Apr
dust24–13-0.0630%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0426%26 Apr
nuke13–100.0451%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0742%26 Apr
inferno11–40.1352%26 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0232%26 Apr
mirage13–40.0352%26 Apr
dust22–13-0.0738%26 Apr
dust20–5-0.0714%26 Apr
mirage13–20.0945%25 Apr
inferno13–50.1138%25 Apr
anubis13–70.0336%25 Apr
mirage13–00.1137%25 Apr
mirage5–20.0735%25 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0033%25 Apr
mirage7–130.0437%25 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0435%25 Apr
dust24–90.0350%25 Apr
overpass13–70.0433%25 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0249%25 Apr
dust213–90.1345%25 Apr
mirage16–140.0733%25 Apr
mirage12–50.0225%24 Apr
dust213–9-0.0919%24 Apr
overpass15–150.1248%24 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0241%24 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0343%24 Apr
dust213–11-0.0222%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →