Berserk Gats

Berserk Gats — CS2 Stats

76561198748070791[U:1:787805063]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

100Tracked matches56%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating18,627Purple band · top ~14% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12259 of 24738 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBerserk GatsPREMIER18,627 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning71
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateWLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim7.0
Aggression10.0
Utility2.0
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels7.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 48% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning7.1
Utility2.0
Mechanics0.0
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time497ms−122ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+6.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22101245%0.03
infernoC2081240%0.03
mirageA1912763%0.03
nukeB168850%-0.00
cacheB105550%-0.00
anubisD72529%0.00
ancient43175%0.02
overpass1010%-0.18
office1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.3%Spray accuracy
48.4%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
454msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
65.8%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
6.59HE damage / grenade
7.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2374 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.1052%29 Aug
dust212–160.0239%29 Aug
dust213–90.1850%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0524%24 Aug
nuke6–10-0.0520%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.1019%23 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0515%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0032%22 Aug
nuke3–13-0.100%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.025%22 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0812%22 Aug
cache13–7-0.0423%22 Aug
overpass8–8-0.189%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0215%22 Aug
inferno2–9-0.150%22 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0833%22 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0919%22 Aug
mirage16–120.0835%21 Aug
mirage13–10.1724%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0427%20 Aug
mirage13–50.0531%15 Aug
anubis6–130.0428%15 Aug
anubis15–150.0214%14 Aug
dust213–100.0723%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0327%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0519%14 Aug
ancient13–20.1124%13 Aug
inferno15–150.0831%12 Aug
anubis16–140.0222%12 Aug
mirage13–20.017%12 Aug
inferno10–130.0117%9 Aug
nuke13–80.1819%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0722%9 Aug
nuke10–130.0518%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0125%7 Aug
inferno15–150.0510%7 Aug
inferno13–60.075%7 Aug
cache13–90.0634%2 Aug
dust213–20.0129%25 Jul
cache15–150.0717%19 Jul
inferno15–150.0223%18 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0314%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.096%18 Jul
inferno8–130.0135%17 Jul
dust213–90.0219%17 Jul
mirage9–130.0312%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.0415%16 Jul
inferno13–50.167%15 Jul
dust213–90.0721%15 Jul
inferno7–50.2014%15 Jul
nuke9–5-0.0814%15 Jul
dust210–130.0422%14 Jul
nuke13–10.0415%13 Jul
office6–130.039%13 Jul
dust213–80.1215%13 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0913%13 Jul
mirage8–130.0111%13 Jul
dust24–13-0.0520%13 Jul
nuke13–00.0444%13 Jul
cache6–130.0216%12 Jul
ancient13–20.0110%12 Jul
dust213–70.0620%12 Jul
cache16–130.0913%12 Jul
inferno7–130.0115%11 Jul
ancient13–40.0941%11 Jul
mirage13–110.1024%11 Jul
cache13–100.0324%11 Jul
cache13–70.0415%10 Jul
mirage13–40.1517%10 Jul
mirage13–30.1621%10 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0411%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.048%9 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0615%9 Jul
inferno13–30.1511%8 Jul
inferno13–00.1818%7 Jul
dust23–13-0.010%7 Jul
dust213–100.0923%6 Jul
inferno9–30.2931%26 Jun
dust27–130.1122%26 Jun
nuke13–10.077%25 Jun
dust213–10.1214%25 Jun
dust27–130.1514%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.118%17 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0614%16 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0623%15 Jun
nuke13–4-0.024%15 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0713%30 May
mirage0–13-0.043%30 May
dust27–13-0.0921%30 May
inferno9–40.0815%30 May
dust23–13-0.078%25 May
dust26–00.076%25 May
dust24–13-0.056%25 May
cache7–10-0.158%10 May
cache3–7-0.095%8 May
inferno2–13-0.1110%8 May
nuke6–8-0.09100%7 May
mirage9–130.0113%7 May
nuke6–13-0.0311%3 May
dust28–13-0.0517%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →