Full-bridge Rectifier (Adam) — CS2 Stats

76561198433162793[U:1:472897065]✓ No bans

2,197Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,078Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,059 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFull-bridge Rectifier (Ad…FACEITLevel 5 · 1,059 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42535Last 10042%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression3.6
Utility4.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time633ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31171455%-0.02
dust2D30102033%-0.02
ancientC94544%0.02
nukeD93633%-0.02
infernoS64267%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.04
cache31233%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.06
overpass21150%-0.01
train21150%0.01
stronghold1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,190Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
4,288Matches
42.0%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
8,939MVPs
2,078Hours (in match)
3,659Bombs planted
977Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,476
AWP4,973
SSG 083,140
MP91,880
FAMAS1,742

Lifetime map wins

12,471dust2
3,017inferno
2,026vertigo
1,709nuke
682train
131lake
106office
70cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

96Matches
49%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
66.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2850%0.8711.8
Ancient1540%0.6710.5
Vertigo1346%0.8213.1
Dust21250%0.8212.6
Anubis1155%0.9713.4
Nuke771%0.6310.0
Inferno540%0.436.0
Overpass2100%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
621msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
9.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5115% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0820%27 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0540%27 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0132%27 Aug
inferno7–130.0113%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0010%26 Aug
ancient4–130.019%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0023%25 Aug
anubis13–90.0223%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.0116%6 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0913%6 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0512%5 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0724%5 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0715%5 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0716%26 May
cache5–13-0.0631%1 May
cache13–30.0234%29 Apr
dust213–40.0733%19 Apr
mirage13–70.0215%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0125%7 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0828%5 Apr
dust213–100.0727%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0415%19 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0632%19 Mar
dust213–60.0418%18 Mar
stronghold3–130.0125%18 Mar
nuke12–120.1023%18 Mar
dust26–13-0.068%18 Mar
mirage5–1-0.0325%18 Mar
mirage13–90.059%17 Mar
dust213–60.0214%17 Mar
mirage12–120.0623%9 Mar
nuke7–9-0.1719%8 Mar
vertigo12–12-0.0414%8 Mar
dust28–13-0.0110%8 Mar
inferno9–20.0029%8 Mar
mirage13–6-0.1124%8 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0221%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0119%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0524%21 Feb
dust26–13-0.0762%21 Feb
nuke6–130.0018%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.0815%11 Feb
dust21–12-0.0933%11 Feb
vertigo4–13-0.087%7 Feb
nuke13–4-0.004%7 Feb
ancient16–130.0316%2 Feb
mirage13–80.0028%30 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0534%30 Jan
ancient13–5-0.048%29 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0237%28 Jan
nuke13–90.0426%28 Jan
dust216–140.0121%28 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0213%28 Jan
mirage14–16-0.1021%19 Jan
dust27–13-0.0525%19 Jan
dust210–13-0.0619%19 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0125%15 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0712%15 Jan
dust210–13-0.0431%15 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0120%15 Jan
dust213–60.0518%12 Jan
nuke8–130.0121%5 Jan
dust213–100.0313%5 Jan
mirage13–30.0127%5 Jan
inferno13–70.1323%24 Dec
train8–13-0.0110%24 Dec
dust213–16-0.0523%20 Dec
dust213–70.0120%16 Dec
mirage13–70.0327%16 Dec
ancient10–130.0016%16 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0417%15 Dec
mirage12–120.0217%15 Dec
mirage4–130.0033%15 Dec
dust213–10.0131%15 Dec
inferno13–1-0.006%15 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0019%6 Dec
dust216–120.0015%6 Dec
ancient9–130.0116%6 Dec
nuke0–13-0.0850%6 Dec
dust211–13-0.0110%2 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0325%2 Dec
overpass8–13-0.0131%2 Dec
dust26–13-0.0926%20 Nov
mirage13–100.0022%20 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0234%20 Nov
ancient13–100.0415%19 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0418%19 Nov
dust29–13-0.0619%17 Nov
dust211–130.0220%17 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0220%16 Nov
dust212–120.0317%15 Nov
dust213–16-0.0314%12 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0522%12 Nov
mirage13–9-0.0123%11 Nov
mirage13–110.0422%10 Nov
dust29–13-0.0325%10 Nov
train13–10.0425%10 Nov
ancient13–40.1231%10 Nov
dust22–13-0.0623%7 Nov
nuke13–8-0.0021%7 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →