Khalid Pashtoon — CS2 Stats

76561198422858379[U:1:462592651]

487Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
658Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,142Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14035 of 27476 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.7%42.5%44.2%1.5% short
Shot accuracy15.7%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.050.991.04meets
Match win rate46.2%44.2%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKhalid PashtoonFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,142 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning38
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50455Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLLTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression2.4
Utility4.0
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.8
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time638ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 12–2
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 33dust2Weakest map · 29% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS33221167%-0.00
dust2D2471729%-0.02
anubisA1710759%0.00
ancientB136746%0.00
nukeB63350%0.00
infernoC52340%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.01
cache1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,405Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1,438Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
42.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,200MVPs
658Hours (in match)
1,085Bombs planted
614Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,329dust2
1,972inferno
702vertigo
413nuke
322train
112cbble
7office
1aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
644msReaction time
22.6%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
12.69HE damage / grenade
4.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.558% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass4–13-0.0132%13 May
mirage13–110.0320%13 May
nuke12–160.0514%5 May
anubis9–13-0.0412%1 May
inferno9–13-0.0731%1 May
mirage3–13-0.0828%30 Apr
cache12–120.0118%29 Apr
anubis5–130.0431%28 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0529%28 Apr
anubis10–130.0430%27 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0622%26 Apr
anubis13–100.0016%26 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0429%24 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0316%24 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0122%22 Apr
dust213–7-0.0519%21 Apr
anubis13–110.0230%21 Apr
dust213–50.0127%20 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0021%20 Apr
dust28–13-0.0524%20 Apr
dust27–13-0.0719%19 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0414%16 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0418%16 Apr
mirage13–70.0121%15 Apr
mirage13–90.0131%14 Apr
mirage13–110.0130%13 Apr
dust22–13-0.0221%13 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0613%11 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0716%10 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0023%10 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0217%9 Apr
anubis13–110.0242%9 Apr
mirage12–160.0236%9 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0216%8 Apr
dust213–110.0413%8 Apr
anubis13–60.0724%8 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0517%7 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0019%7 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0626%6 Apr
dust26–13-0.0635%6 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0423%3 Apr
mirage16–120.0430%2 Apr
anubis13–90.0333%2 Apr
dust212–20.1020%1 Apr
anubis7–130.0313%1 Apr
ancient13–100.0431%1 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0416%1 Apr
anubis13–90.0112%31 Mar
dust27–00.0513%31 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0712%30 Mar
dust27–13-0.0031%30 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0128%29 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0324%29 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0732%27 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0119%27 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0426%27 Mar
anubis13–70.0320%25 Mar
dust27–13-0.0233%25 Mar
inferno13–50.0030%25 Mar
dust214–16-0.0122%24 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0220%24 Mar
mirage13–80.1026%24 Mar
dust210–13-0.0823%23 Mar
ancient16–13-0.0017%23 Mar
dust29–13-0.0128%20 Mar
ancient14–160.0511%20 Mar
dust211–130.0019%20 Mar
dust27–13-0.0732%19 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0124%19 Mar
mirage13–30.0132%18 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0019%17 Mar
nuke13–100.0823%17 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0121%17 Mar
dust210–13-0.017%16 Mar
ancient13–10.0721%16 Mar
mirage13–70.0113%14 Mar
ancient5–13-0.058%14 Mar
mirage13–60.0217%13 Mar
dust215–15-0.0010%13 Mar
anubis13–40.0319%13 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0524%13 Mar
mirage13–100.0321%13 Mar
mirage13–90.0417%12 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0613%11 Mar
dust216–140.0126%11 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0130%28 Feb
ancient13–70.0328%28 Feb
mirage15–150.0324%27 Feb
mirage8–130.0427%27 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0614%26 Feb
dust213–5-0.0219%26 Feb
dust210–13-0.0611%26 Feb
ancient11–130.0913%25 Feb
inferno13–100.0518%25 Feb
dust210–13-0.0722%22 Feb
mirage13–90.0117%22 Feb
dust215–150.0117%21 Feb
mirage13–30.0714%21 Feb
dust215–15-0.0221%19 Feb
mirage16–120.0724%16 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →