Looper98 — CS2 Stats

76561198410778685[U:1:450512957]

1,158Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,448Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate41.4%41.2%42.2%meets
Shot accuracy17.1%12.5%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.930.960.980.05 short
Match win rate35.7%42.8%43.6%7.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLooper98FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning39
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1
Aggression6.6
Utility1.0
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning3.9
Utility1.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time683ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 683ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
10Longest win streak
L5Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5officeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36191753%-0.02
dust2B28151354%-0.02
officeC73443%-0.02
overpassC73443%-0.05
nukeA53260%0.00
anubis4040%-0.01
ancient41325%-0.00
train43175%-0.01
inferno32167%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

67,042Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
4,402Matches
35.7%Match win rate
41.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players
6,147MVPs
1,342Hours (in match)
2,819Bombs planted
479Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,646
AWP9,809
MP72,914
SG 5532,535
AUG2,025
SSG 082,004

Lifetime map wins

9,349dust2
2,151inferno
783nuke
711train
512vertigo
398office
377lake
274cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.4%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
669msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
0.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2414 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8604% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0420%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0720%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.075%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0425%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0121%21 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0229%21 Jun
office7–13-0.0011%31 May
mirage13–20.0236%4 May
mirage13–7-0.0326%4 May
dust213–10-0.0327%10 Apr
vertigo4–13-0.0225%10 Apr
vertigo13–4-0.0124%10 Apr
office0–13-0.070%22 Mar
office5–10.03100%22 Mar
office9–130.0121%22 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0920%9 Feb
nuke7–30.048%9 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0817%9 Feb
anubis12–120.0613%9 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0825%4 Feb
dust215–15-0.0422%30 Jan
dust213–20.0613%30 Jan
nuke13–80.0421%30 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0114%29 Jan
dust213–100.0421%29 Jan
ancient8–130.0015%28 Jan
mirage13–100.0019%28 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0218%28 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0333%27 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0424%27 Jan
mirage11–130.0022%26 Jan
anubis11–130.0010%26 Jan
ancient13–60.0719%26 Jan
dust29–13-0.0216%26 Jan
mirage13–90.0129%26 Jan
dust29–13-0.0530%26 Jan
dust21–13-0.0328%25 Jan
anubis14–16-0.0418%25 Jan
mirage13–7-0.077%25 Jan
mirage10–130.0215%25 Jan
office13–11-0.0322%22 Jan
office9–13-0.0332%22 Jan
dust28–13-0.0914%21 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0413%20 Jan
mirage12–120.0119%20 Jan
mirage13–110.0121%20 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0425%19 Jan
mirage13–70.0433%19 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0420%18 Jan
dust213–100.0327%18 Jan
dust213–80.1135%16 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0429%16 Jan
overpass13–7-0.096%16 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0719%16 Jan
dust29–20.0540%8 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0731%8 Jan
dust213–8-0.0720%8 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0623%7 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0619%6 Jan
train13–9-0.0118%6 Jan
train1–13-0.037%5 Jan
dust213–9-0.0210%5 Jan
dust213–7-0.0528%5 Jan
dust213–90.0222%4 Jan
office13–3-0.0316%4 Jan
train13–10-0.0215%4 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0324%4 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0035%4 Jan
mirage13–20.1310%3 Jan
dust210–13-0.058%2 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0712%2 Jan
dust213–5-0.078%1 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0327%1 Jan
dust213–5-0.0321%31 Dec
dust213–10-0.0415%31 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0412%31 Dec
dust24–130.0319%28 Dec
mirage13–60.0329%28 Dec
overpass8–13-0.0123%28 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0612%28 Dec
dust29–13-0.0519%27 Dec
mirage13–110.0622%26 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0029%26 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0425%26 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0610%25 Dec
nuke12–160.0418%25 Dec
train13–110.0129%25 Dec
mirage3–0-0.070%25 Dec
dust213–7-0.0420%25 Dec
overpass6–2-0.0521%25 Dec
dust213–90.0132%24 Dec
overpass4–13-0.0540%23 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0225%23 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0122%21 Dec
dust210–13-0.1014%21 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0429%21 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0221%15 Dec
mirage11–130.0034%15 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0522%14 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0124%12 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →