So BAD

So BAD — CS2 Stats

DE76561198403949299[U:1:443683571]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

254Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
794Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning41
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46477Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.10 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression3.3
Utility2.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.1

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.1
Utility2.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time696ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 696ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+7.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — poseidon 9–6
162Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
31Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 50% over 10poseidonWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB54252946%0.00
cacheB22101245%0.01
overpassB105550%-0.01
poseidonC52340%0.10
anubis21150%0.05
dust22020%0.04
vertigo2020%-0.05
ancient110100%0.07
inferno110100%0.00
nuke110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

47,731Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
2,601Matches
41.8%Match win rate
44.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
20.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
7,307MVPs
794Hours (in match)
3,039Bombs planted
738Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,818
AWP4,548
MP71,264
SSG 081,143
P250926
P90811

Lifetime map wins

1,436dust2
869inferno
400cbble
349vertigo
282train
258lake
250nuke
93safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
669msReaction time
13.7%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
12.75HE damage / grenade
2.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3606 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.7299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon6–90.1324%2 May
cache13–110.1825%2 May
cache13–60.0514%2 May
anubis16–140.0924%27 Apr
poseidon3–90.0129%27 Apr
poseidon8–80.0553%27 Apr
ancient13–100.0717%26 Apr
poseidon9–60.2439%20 Apr
poseidon9–50.0731%20 Apr
mirage13–20.0118%20 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0425%19 Apr
dust210–130.0723%16 Apr
anubis6–130.0026%16 Apr
mirage9–4-0.0224%30 Apr
mirage5–90.0333%30 Apr
mirage13–160.0114%26 Apr
cache4–9-0.0816%25 Apr
mirage6–90.0419%25 Apr
mirage8–8-0.026%19 Apr
mirage3–9-0.1210%19 Apr
mirage9–4-0.178%18 Apr
mirage9–40.0324%16 Apr
mirage16–130.0114%15 Apr
mirage15–150.0220%15 Apr
overpass9–16-0.0214%15 Apr
cache9–2-0.1015%14 Apr
mirage9–60.018%14 Apr
cache7–9-0.0115%14 Apr
mirage1–9-0.120%12 Apr
dust26–9-0.0021%11 Apr
mirage9–50.0126%11 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0815%11 Apr
mirage4–90.0230%7 Apr
overpass13–160.0321%6 Apr
mirage11–160.0211%6 Apr
mirage3–90.0610%6 Apr
mirage9–16-0.0219%5 Apr
mirage16–130.0215%5 Apr
overpass16–70.048%5 Apr
mirage4–9-0.0817%5 Apr
mirage9–6-0.053%5 Apr
mirage6–9-0.0513%4 Apr
cache5–9-0.0523%3 Apr
mirage9–70.042%3 Apr
mirage9–50.1036%2 Apr
mirage16–100.108%2 Apr
cache4–90.0813%2 Apr
cache9–30.028%1 Apr
mirage7–90.0514%30 Mar
mirage9–60.0729%30 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0113%29 Mar
overpass9–16-0.067%29 Mar
inferno16–120.0011%28 Mar
mirage16–120.006%28 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0318%28 Mar
mirage16–9-0.0116%27 Mar
mirage4–9-0.0217%26 Mar
cache6–9-0.0310%26 Mar
mirage9–20.0813%26 Mar
mirage3–9-0.1232%31 Dec
mirage16–110.0221%14 Dec
cache16–110.0120%14 Dec
overpass9–1-0.0118%14 Dec
mirage6–90.009%12 Dec
mirage9–60.088%11 Dec
cache2–9-0.035%10 Dec
mirage7–90.078%10 Dec
cache8–80.0813%9 Dec
mirage9–20.1317%9 Dec
cache5–9-0.0610%8 Dec
mirage9–70.0311%8 Dec
mirage6–90.0220%7 Dec
cache1–9-0.0410%6 Dec
mirage8–80.0316%6 Dec
overpass16–9-0.0218%6 Dec
cache9–60.078%5 Dec
mirage8–80.0511%5 Dec
mirage7–9-0.006%4 Dec
cache3–9-0.0414%4 Dec
mirage2–9-0.0721%3 Dec
mirage9–40.0517%2 Dec
cache16–70.025%1 Dec
mirage16–130.0412%1 Dec
cache16–20.134%1 Dec
vertigo5–9-0.0521%1 Dec
mirage16–100.0519%30 Nov
overpass9–40.0214%30 Nov
overpass6–90.0017%30 Nov
cache16–110.0915%30 Nov
mirage9–70.0215%29 Nov
cache9–6-0.004%29 Nov
mirage2–9-0.0813%28 Nov
cache2–9-0.0123%28 Nov
mirage6–16-0.076%28 Nov
vertigo13–16-0.0513%28 Nov
cache5–90.0110%27 Nov
mirage4–16-0.035%26 Nov
nuke9–70.0013%26 Nov
overpass15–150.019%25 Nov
mirage11–160.0417%25 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →