noobmaster69

noobmaster69 — CS2 Stats

NL76561198399016490[U:1:438750762]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

53Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
870Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,627Blue band · top ~41% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8144 of 11629 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnoobmaster69PREMIER12,627 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning50
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY28222Last 5254%Win rateLWWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression7.1
Utility7.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning5.0
Utility7.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time650ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 52 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 16–13
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
23In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
26Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.04
infernoA117464%0.02
dust2D72529%0.04
nuke43175%0.01
ancient31233%0.04
overpass21150%0.03
anubis21150%-0.02

Across the last 52 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,618Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,447Matches
36.9%Match win rate
35.3%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
9,026MVPs
870Hours (in match)
2,113Bombs planted
356Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,850inferno
1,388dust2
380train
300cbble
161nuke
150lake
29safehouse
14office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
654msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
14.32HE damage / grenade
12.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–130.0124%30 Mar
mirage8–40.0620%24 Mar
dust213–40.1516%24 Mar
mirage0–13-0.086%23 Mar
dust29–130.0214%22 Mar
mirage14–16-0.036%19 Mar
mirage16–140.1010%16 Mar
nuke13–1-0.0729%12 Mar
overpass11–130.0215%11 Mar
inferno13–80.0727%10 Mar
dust213–90.0516%9 Mar
inferno13–50.059%9 Mar
nuke9–13-0.026%8 Mar
dust29–130.0222%8 Mar
mirage13–110.0116%8 Mar
mirage3–130.0216%4 Mar
mirage13–30.108%2 Mar
dust24–130.0818%1 Mar
anubis13–100.0121%26 Feb
mirage16–130.1712%26 Feb
mirage13–90.0114%25 Feb
dust25–13-0.0222%24 Feb
mirage13–100.1620%24 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0315%24 Feb
ancient9–130.0216%23 Feb
mirage13–50.1111%23 Feb
mirage7–130.1314%23 Feb
mirage13–60.0015%23 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0116%22 Feb
nuke16–100.0311%29 Aug
inferno16–70.023%9 Aug
inferno6–16-0.0614%20 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0622%21 Jun
mirage7–16-0.098%19 Jun
anubis6–16-0.059%15 Apr
inferno15–150.006%30 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0212%29 Mar
mirage9–160.0710%27 Mar
inferno16–11-0.029%23 Mar
mirage4–16-0.0413%23 Mar
overpass16–80.039%8 Mar
mirage15–150.0519%2 Mar
nuke16–60.1018%2 Mar
ancient11–16-0.0415%15 Feb
mirage16–130.0816%14 Feb
inferno16–50.038%14 Feb
mirage16–130.1215%12 Feb
inferno16–40.1410%12 Feb
inferno16–100.0214%12 Feb
inferno14–160.0410%12 Feb
mirage16–90.0310%3 Feb
ancient16–100.148%17 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →