EA$Y @thebookclublibrary — CS2 Stats

US76561198394131907[U:1:433866179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,564Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating17,475Purple band · top ~18.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#29544 of 58488 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42

Positioning41

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–49–9Last 10042%Win rateLLWWWWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2

Aggression4.1

Utility5.3

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2

Positioning4.1

Utility5.3

Mechanics3.1

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact8.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time588ms−96ms

first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 9–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	21	9–12	43%	-0.03
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.04
mirage	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.02
inferno	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.02
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.02
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.03
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

646Matches

47%Win rate

0.81Avg K/D

65.3ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	27	48%	0.75	13.4
Mirage	23	48%	0.84	10.7
Dust2	21	57%	0.74	11.4
Inferno	20	50%	0.80	12.4
Nuke	14	36%	0.70	10.5
Ancient	10	60%	0.68	9.8
Overpass	7	57%	0.79	14.0
Vertigo	2	100%	0.90	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy

31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.8%Spray accuracy

64.0%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

585msReaction time

24.8%T opening success

41.4%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

10.67HE damage / grenade

13.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.8453% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	4–13	-0.10	21%	30 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.01	18%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	21%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	8%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	26%	19 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.01	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	19%	17 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.06	11%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.03	10%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	12%	16 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.03	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.03	25%	13 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	16%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	11%	12 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.12	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	14%	3 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.00	11%	2 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	11%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	14%	31 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	33%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.02	23%	30 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.05	15%	30 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.08	6%	29 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	12%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	15%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	12%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.07	17%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	22%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.06	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.06	7%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.05	22%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	9%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	13%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	24%	25 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.10	31%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.12	24%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.14	20%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	22%	23 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.07	30%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	17%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	14%	22 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.02	14%	22 Jul →
inferno	1–9	-0.28	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.16	8%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	18%	21 Jul →
shelter	8–13	-0.05	4%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.09	21%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	9%	17 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.00	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.00	22%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	10%	15 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	27%	15 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	22%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	27%	14 Jul →
inferno	2–9	-0.04	26%	14 Jul →
nuke	4–9	-0.08	11%	14 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.08	12%	14 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	26%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	21%	14 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.10	8%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	13%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	28%	12 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	12%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	6%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–1	0.10	50%	11 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	11%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	30%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	21%	11 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.07	17%	8 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	16%	8 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	9%	8 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.10	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	18%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	8%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.01	22%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	14%	3 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	15%	3 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.02	29%	3 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.10	22%	2 Jul →