otrix

otrix — CS2 Stats

GB76561198389811262[U:1:429545534]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

403Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,207Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,669), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate50.5%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy13.4%10.8%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.001.020.10 short
Match win rate37.7%44.1%45.0%7.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGotrixFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning50
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD61336Last 10061%Win rateWLLWLLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression4.9
Utility4.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning5.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time631ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — nuke 9–0
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 92% over 13dust2Weakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB45232251%-0.01
nukeS1312192%0.02
dust2B105550%0.03
infernoS96367%0.01
ancientA85363%0.00
anubisS64267%-0.00
vertigo330100%-0.00
overpass21150%0.03
office21150%0.05
train1010%-0.08
italy110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,163Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,086Matches
37.7%Match win rate
50.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,368MVPs
655Hours (in match)
1,154Bombs planted
322Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,949dust2
1,260inferno
1,005nuke
426office
310train
272vertigo
133lake
70cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
33%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
89.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%1.0216.8
Vertigo10%0.628.0
Inferno10%1.3523.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
26.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
625msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
10.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6174% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–5-0.0613%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0320%29 Aug
train9–13-0.086%4 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0319%3 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0625%3 Apr
dust26–50.0131%3 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0113%1 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0230%29 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0230%29 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0511%28 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0617%28 Mar
ancient1–13-0.016%24 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0624%21 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0618%21 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0221%21 Mar
overpass13–100.1011%21 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0520%21 Mar
inferno10–13-0.017%20 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0113%20 Mar
inferno9–40.1112%19 Mar
dust29–13-0.0711%16 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0214%16 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0417%15 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0338%15 Mar
vertigo13–11-0.105%8 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0219%3 Mar
inferno13–2-0.0118%24 Feb
mirage11–130.0112%23 Feb
mirage13–50.0211%23 Feb
nuke9–6-0.1317%23 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0411%21 Feb
nuke6–130.0119%21 Feb
mirage13–50.0714%21 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0418%21 Feb
mirage13–100.0230%20 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0123%6 Jan
nuke13–70.0416%5 Jan
nuke13–10.0229%5 Jan
dust213–10.1421%5 Jan
nuke13–20.0320%4 Jan
mirage8–130.0835%4 Jan
nuke13–60.0414%1 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0333%1 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0212%1 Jan
mirage13–10.0415%1 Jan
office3–130.0337%1 Jan
ancient13–90.0112%30 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0217%30 Dec
mirage8–7-0.039%26 Dec
mirage13–30.0919%26 Dec
ancient13–80.0615%25 Dec
dust213–11-0.076%25 Dec
dust25–13-0.0511%23 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0415%23 Dec
mirage13–110.0321%23 Dec
inferno13–110.0311%22 Dec
mirage13–60.0719%22 Dec
mirage2–13-0.0423%22 Dec
mirage8–13-0.064%7 Oct
dust25–13-0.057%7 Oct
inferno8–8-0.0318%5 Oct
mirage13–70.009%3 Oct
anubis13–50.0610%3 Oct
nuke13–5-0.0427%3 Oct
anubis13–90.1011%26 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0513%26 Sept
office13–80.0826%26 Sept
italy13–60.0517%26 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0417%26 Sept
inferno9–20.1116%26 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0118%22 Sept
nuke9–00.3311%22 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0611%21 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0121%21 Sept
mirage13–80.0312%20 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0626%20 Sept
nuke13–90.0212%20 Sept
mirage13–7-0.087%19 Sept
nuke13–30.049%19 Sept
mirage12–120.0414%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0518%16 Sept
mirage5–3-0.0313%15 Sept
mirage13–110.0115%15 Sept
vertigo13–70.0810%14 Sept
mirage13–80.0316%14 Sept
vertigo13–60.0119%14 Sept
dust210–130.0416%14 Sept
nuke13–90.0118%12 Sept
ancient13–90.0215%12 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0118%8 Jul
dust213–40.1119%8 Jul
mirage13–0-0.009%6 Jul
mirage13–00.0317%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0425%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0219%3 Jul
dust213–10.1215%2 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0026%2 Jul
mirage13–20.0331%2 Jul
mirage9–130.0115%2 Jul
dust213–20.0717%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →