ZcrawlerV — CS2 Stats

76561198373797323[U:1:413531595]✓ No bans

167Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
277Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating4,990Grey band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26634 of 34631 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate52.6%40.1%above
Shot accuracy5.4%7.6%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.020.92above
Match win rate44.2%42.2%above

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZcrawlerVPREMIER4,990 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning53
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWLWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression7.9
Utility5.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time677ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 767ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy27.9%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–3
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%0.02
mirageB25121348%0.01
infernoC1661038%0.02
nukeB137654%-0.00
anubisD82625%-0.02
ancientS64267%0.02
cache3030%0.04
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,929Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
548Matches
44.2%Match win rate
52.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
5.4%Shot accuracy
805MVPs
168Hours (in match)
266Bombs planted
104Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,075dust2
487nuke
476inferno
169train
69vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.7%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
675msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–14-0.0028%29 Aug
inferno11–130.1216%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0118%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0424%26 Aug
mirage13–30.0635%25 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0532%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0437%18 Aug
mirage7–130.0013%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0136%16 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0933%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0316%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0619%13 Aug
mirage13–30.0118%11 Aug
nuke13–110.0218%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0229%9 Aug
nuke2–130.0750%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0430%7 Aug
dust27–130.0044%7 Aug
dust213–50.0733%6 Aug
inferno13–00.0624%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0116%4 Aug
inferno3–130.1040%4 Aug
dust29–130.0536%4 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0223%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0134%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0432%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0423%31 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0436%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0532%30 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0021%30 Jul
nuke13–40.0320%30 Jul
dust26–130.0235%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0214%29 Jul
vertigo13–4-0.0114%29 Jul
mirage13–00.1114%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0118%25 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0516%25 Jul
dust23–130.0418%25 Jul
dust213–30.1728%25 Jul
dust213–10.0617%25 Jul
dust23–10.010%25 Jul
dust22–13-0.0317%25 Jul
inferno7–130.0421%24 Jul
dust213–10-0.0435%24 Jul
dust27–130.0422%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.0411%24 Jul
ancient5–130.139%24 Jul
dust213–100.0327%24 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0427%24 Jul
dust21–130.0036%23 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0060%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0622%23 Jul
dust212–10.1431%23 Jul
anubis8–130.0119%23 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0122%22 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0316%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0319%22 Jul
anubis5–130.0023%22 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0714%22 Jul
anubis13–110.0417%22 Jul
dust28–00.1339%22 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0913%21 Jul
inferno13–50.0722%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.1333%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0325%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0617%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0410%20 Jul
dust28–13-0.0416%19 Jul
nuke8–130.0130%19 Jul
inferno5–130.0435%18 Jul
mirage11–130.0115%18 Jul
dust211–130.0324%18 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0850%18 Jul
dust213–10.0145%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0325%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0316%16 Jul
dust213–60.1142%16 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0367%16 Jul
mirage13–60.1220%16 Jul
dust213–100.0233%16 Jul
nuke13–60.0333%16 Jul
cache5–13-0.0135%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0931%15 Jul
dust24–130.0937%15 Jul
inferno1–8-0.018%15 Jul
dust212–12-0.0317%15 Jul
dust20–13-0.0038%15 Jul
inferno11–130.0122%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0230%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0320%14 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0347%14 Jul
dust22–13-0.0217%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0214%13 Jul
inferno13–100.1429%13 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0429%13 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0324%13 Jul
cache10–130.1630%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0537%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0027%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →