Nimbus — CS2 Stats

EE76561198372923380[U:1:412657652]Steam profile ↗

559Tracked matches69%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating22,594Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6915 of 25665 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning71

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46–43–11Last 10046%Win rateWWWWWWWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.0

Aggression10.0

Utility4.9

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels6.0

Clutch5.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.1

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels6.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time530ms−23ms

first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms

Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.0%

first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — anubis 13–7

13–1Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

W9Current streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	20	7–13	35%	0.04
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	0.05
inferno	C	14	6–8	43%	0.03
anubis	S	13	9–4	69%	0.06
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.04
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
vertigo	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

230Matches

54%Win rate

1.52Avg K/D

96.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	18	67%	1.79	22.6
Dust2	10	20%	1.18	18.0
Inferno	5	60%	1.44	24.0
Cache	3	67%	2.16	23.0
Ancient	2	0%	1.09	17.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.45	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy

40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

82.0%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

526msReaction time

46.3%T opening success

61.6%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

11.7%Flash assists

9.11HE damage / grenade

2.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.0261 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–2	0.12	27%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.12	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	32%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.11	13%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.12	24%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.13	26%	20 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.13	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.15	23%	20 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	0.01	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	30%	20 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	8%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.09	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	13%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.06	16%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.07	41%	17 Aug →
inferno	22–20	0.03	14%	17 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.03	32%	17 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	26%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.22	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.12	33%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	37%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.07	11%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.05	25%	16 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	18%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.03	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.01	26%	16 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	14%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.09	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.06	22%	16 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.08	23%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.15	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.10	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.02	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.08	23%	16 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.02	6%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.13	19%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.14	28%	15 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	22%	15 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	16%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	18%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.05	23%	14 Aug →
ancient	12–7	0.01	11%	14 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	18%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	16%	14 Aug →
nuke	0–6	-0.08	0%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	18%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	38%	14 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.02	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	34%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	24%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	14%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.00	13%	13 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.07	15%	13 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.08	20%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.14	32%	27 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.04	23%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	7%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	14%	27 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.01	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.07	27%	26 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	33%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.10	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.03	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	13%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	22%	25 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.11	21%	23 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.01	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.06	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.01	27%	23 Jul →
shelter	13–7	0.12	33%	23 Jul →
boulder	2–13	-0.06	15%	23 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.01	18%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	32%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.08	4%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.10	11%	7 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	10%	7 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.03	17%	6 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.00	32%	6 Jul →