Qen — CS2 Stats

76561198361749292[U:1:401483564]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,374Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,082Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,506Purple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22746 of 54931 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	45.7%	42.2%	42.7%	above
Shot accuracy	18.6%	11.9%	10.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.20	0.98	1.00	above
Match win rate	49.4%	43.6%	44.1%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning62

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression10.0

Utility5.9

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.7

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning6.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time475ms−61ms

first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 475ms

Headshot accuracy21.5%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	43	21–22	49%	0.03
inferno	B	26	13–13	50%	0.03
anubis	S	11	9–2	82%	0.05
overpass	A	10	6–4	60%	0.07
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	0.04
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,472Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players

3,713Matches

49.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players

45.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players

18.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 3 players

13,443MVPs

1,760Hours (in match)

4,378Bombs planted

2,526Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,403

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,297

AWP13,248

Desert Eagle7,441

P2000 / USP-S4,886

Glock-183,713

MAC-101,534

MP91,416

Galil AR1,301

SG 5531,249

Lifetime map wins

10,509inferno

4,640dust2

1,786nuke

1,670train

1,437vertigo

158office

117cbble

71lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches

48%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

—ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.1%Spray accuracy

84.5%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

474msReaction time

37.1%T opening success

60.5%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

8.7%Flash assists

10.04HE damage / grenade

12.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.1364% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	0.05	18%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	22%	18 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.06	16%	18 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	27%	18 Aug →
inferno	3–0	0.14	22%	22 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.00	24%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.21	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	23%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.09	18%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.11	21%	16 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	24%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.06	21%	13 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.05	29%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.19	21%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	27%	13 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	29%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	26%	30 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.04	15%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.06	45%	24 Jun →
inferno	16–12	-0.01	15%	18 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	15%	18 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	19%	11 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.14	15%	11 Jun →
anubis	12–2	0.05	31%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	15%	27 May →
inferno	13–3	0.08	19%	27 May →
overpass	13–8	0.14	20%	27 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	13 May →
mirage	16–12	0.06	21%	13 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	11%	13 May →
overpass	8–13	0.06	28%	7 May →
mirage	13–8	0.11	40%	7 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	19%	7 May →
mirage	13–10	0.09	24%	3 May →
inferno	11–13	0.05	21%	3 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	11%	2 May →
overpass	13–10	0.03	12%	2 May →
anubis	13–5	0.02	24%	2 May →
anubis	13–10	0.09	12%	30 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.09	20%	30 Apr →
inferno	0–13	-0.08	25%	23 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.02	20%	23 Apr →
overpass	8–13	0.08	22%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	19 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.06	24%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.16	33%	19 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.11	25%	8 Apr →
anubis	13–10	0.02	24%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.06	19%	1 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.14	19%	1 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	29%	1 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	24%	25 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	10%	25 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.10	30%	6 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.07	38%	6 Mar →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	19%	28 Feb →
overpass	6–13	0.04	15%	28 Feb →
mirage	16–12	0.08	18%	28 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	24%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.09	17%	18 Feb →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	13%	18 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	40%	18 Feb →
anubis	11–13	0.02	27%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.06	21%	18 Feb →
overpass	13–5	0.16	27%	15 Feb →
inferno	7–13	0.13	31%	15 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.00	30%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.06	15%	6 Feb →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	26%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.06	27%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.13	27%	14 Jan →
inferno	13–5	0.08	11%	14 Jan →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	18%	14 Jan →
ancient	10–13	0.02	23%	7 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.06	22%	7 Jan →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	24%	1 Jan →
mirage	8–13	0.06	22%	1 Jan →
inferno	13–7	0.04	25%	1 Jan →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	10%	1 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.08	26%	31 Dec →
mirage	13–10	0.08	20%	31 Dec →
mirage	7–13	0.01	17%	31 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	23%	24 Dec →
overpass	13–8	0.15	17%	24 Dec →
ancient	16–14	0.07	20%	21 Dec →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	27%	21 Dec →
mirage	8–3	0.12	26%	21 Dec →
mirage	13–8	0.11	23%	19 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	16%	19 Dec →
inferno	13–10	0.04	18%	19 Dec →
overpass	16–12	0.04	33%	19 Dec →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	5%	4 Dec →
mirage	10–13	0.06	27%	4 Dec →
ancient	10–13	0.02	39%	4 Dec →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	16%	8 Nov →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	13%	5 Nov →
overpass	11–13	0.05	33%	5 Nov →