Cookie — CS2 Stats

76561198353467506[U:1:393201778]

1,011Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,816Pink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5849 of 14523 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCookieFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,816 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateTWLWLLWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.3
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time640ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–2
130Biggest win — overpass
3Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB25121348%-0.01
nukeB1910953%-0.02
ancientB189950%0.00
cacheB157847%-0.01
anubisD1321115%0.01
overpass440100%0.05
mirage2020%-0.05
dust221150%0.03
debris1010%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
83%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
ADR
63%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass3100%1.5314.7
Mirage10%0.336.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
91.5%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
639msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
15.35HE damage / grenade
4.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4684 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6536% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis15–15-0.0121%25 Aug
inferno13–40.1333%25 Aug
inferno9–130.0320%23 Aug
inferno13–40.0831%21 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0522%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0132%20 Aug
cache13–11-0.0417%20 Aug
debris8–80.0515%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0421%18 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0415%16 Aug
cache10–130.0434%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0621%16 Aug
ancient4–20.0431%16 Aug
vertigo6–9-0.1032%16 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0821%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0020%14 Aug
ancient8–130.0016%13 Aug
cache13–70.0122%6 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0323%3 Aug
cache8–0-0.0133%1 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0612%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.109%30 Jul
dust213–80.0527%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0027%29 Jul
inferno8–130.0421%29 Jul
inferno7–13-0.1110%28 Jul
cache11–13-0.0322%28 Jul
ancient13–90.0517%27 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0433%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0212%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0030%26 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0915%26 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0715%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0428%24 Jul
anubis13–40.0618%24 Jul
cache7–13-0.0826%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0510%24 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0614%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0415%23 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0221%22 Jul
cache4–13-0.0723%22 Jul
inferno13–30.0824%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0126%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0533%21 Jul
anubis6–130.0622%21 Jul
inferno13–100.0128%21 Jul
ancient13–20.0320%20 Jul
anubis9–130.0326%20 Jul
nuke13–40.0120%20 Jul
nuke13–70.0529%17 Jul
cache9–130.0222%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0222%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.0221%17 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0137%16 Jul
cache13–60.0231%16 Jul
nuke13–20.1315%14 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0211%14 Jul
cache1–13-0.0916%14 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0434%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0723%13 Jul
cache13–80.0528%12 Jul
cache13–90.0748%12 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0222%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0135%11 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0122%10 Jul
inferno13–80.0227%6 Jul
anubis7–130.0322%5 Jul
overpass9–10.0022%5 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0421%5 Jul
ancient15–150.0319%2 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0220%28 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0428%28 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0127%27 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0119%26 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0116%26 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0933%25 Jun
ancient6–130.0433%25 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0322%25 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0815%24 Jun
nuke16–140.0222%23 Jun
nuke13–20.0523%14 Jun
anubis11–130.0629%14 Jun
mirage10–130.0023%14 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0333%14 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0141%14 Jun
overpass13–00.1024%9 Jun
ancient13–30.0616%9 Jun
anubis11–130.0218%9 Jun
ancient13–110.0118%7 Jun
overpass8–20.069%7 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0618%7 Jun
dust211–130.0129%7 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0141%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0222%6 Jun
nuke13–40.0120%6 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0110%6 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0328%3 Jun
overpass7–20.0433%3 Jun
ancient13–80.1125%3 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0229%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →