LENA

LENA — CS2 Stats

76561198352553056[U:1:392287328]Steam profile ↗

663Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
783Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,662 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLENAFACEITLevel 8 · 1,662 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning35
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression3.8
Utility5.5
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning3.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time638ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–5
133Biggest win — overpass
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.00
dust2C1881044%-0.02
infernoD124833%-0.01
vertigoB126650%0.00
ancientS65183%-0.01
cacheS660100%0.02
cache_bB63350%0.00
overpass42250%0.03
nuke42250%0.05
anubis21150%0.01
train110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,406Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
1,621Matches
52.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
44.3%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,111MVPs
783Hours (in match)
948Bombs planted
419Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,264
AWP1,903
Knife893
MP9673

Lifetime map wins

3,572inferno
2,104vertigo
1,920dust2
924nuke
373train
42office
36cbble
25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

180Matches
58%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
77.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5456%0.9714.3
Anubis3266%1.0316.3
Dust22868%0.9414.5
Inferno1850%0.9115.3
Nuke1136%0.8815.1
Ancient1155%0.7712.7
Vertigo540%0.8815.2
Overpass1100%2.259.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
641msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
31.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
13.11HE damage / grenade
9.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8087% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–8-0.0113%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0418%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0825%23 Aug
mirage8–130.0316%23 Aug
vertigo13–40.0427%23 Aug
overpass1–13-0.0515%16 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0121%16 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0210%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0215%15 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0124%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0530%15 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0115%13 Aug
dust213–100.0323%13 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0438%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0513%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.0324%7 Aug
overpass13–30.0724%7 Aug
ancient13–100.0214%7 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0720%7 Aug
dust218–22-0.0217%6 Aug
cache13–60.0333%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0411%6 Aug
dust210–130.0529%5 Aug
nuke13–50.0815%5 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0021%5 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0126%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.046%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0425%5 Aug
dust216–13-0.0021%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0117%5 Aug
cache13–70.0524%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0521%3 Aug
nuke11–130.0522%26 Jul
train16–14-0.0226%26 Jul
dust24–13-0.0315%26 Jul
cache13–110.0131%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0432%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0218%23 Jul
cache13–100.0011%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0417%23 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0113%23 Jul
mirage5–130.0311%23 Jul
mirage11–130.1020%22 Jul
inferno10–130.0535%22 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0319%22 Jul
mirage13–30.0211%19 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0312%19 Jul
inferno14–160.0113%28 Jun
vertigo13–90.0131%25 Jun
cache13–6-0.0131%14 Jun
dust213–6-0.039%14 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0518%14 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0224%8 Jun
dust28–13-0.0728%6 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0512%4 Jun
dust28–13-0.0127%27 May
cache13–50.0628%23 May
overpass11–130.0111%23 May
inferno6–13-0.0532%22 May
mirage13–3-0.0518%21 May
mirage13–90.0526%16 May
mirage13–50.0121%13 May
nuke13–50.0917%13 May
vertigo13–90.0316%13 May
mirage11–13-0.0318%13 May
anubis5–130.0315%28 Apr
dust213–4-0.0015%27 Apr
mirage13–100.0319%26 Apr
mirage26–280.0123%26 Apr
mirage16–140.0020%25 Apr
cache_b12–16-0.0717%25 Apr
inferno7–9-0.0740%2 Mar
inferno7–130.0122%23 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0226%22 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0318%16 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0425%16 Feb
cache_b13–100.0229%14 Feb
mirage13–160.0122%8 Jan
cache_b13–70.1039%8 Jan
cache_b12–16-0.0418%7 Jan
mirage13–50.1320%6 Jan
cache_b9–13-0.0214%6 Jan
vertigo4–13-0.0239%6 Jan
dust213–110.0428%6 Jan
mirage4–130.0233%5 Jan
ancient11–130.0420%5 Jan
dust213–9-0.0424%5 Jan
mirage13–100.0324%5 Jan
vertigo14–16-0.0224%4 Jan
dust213–50.0416%4 Jan
mirage13–90.0012%4 Jan
inferno13–90.0420%4 Jan
overpass13–80.1021%4 Jan
cache_b13–100.0225%3 Jan
vertigo19–150.0417%3 Jan
dust23–13-0.0925%3 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0125%2 Jan
mirage13–40.0113%2 Jan
mirage4–13-0.1117%2 Jan
vertigo16–120.0333%2 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →