scxred — CS2 Stats

76561198351578515[U:1:391312787]✓ No bans

1,895Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,258Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,639Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7405 of 22134 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	47.6%	44.9%	46.2%	above
Shot accuracy	11.0%	11.8%	12.5%	1.5% short
Kill/death ratio	1.20	1.04	1.06	above
Match win rate	42.0%	45.3%	45.9%	3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning61

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.8

Utility4.7

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.1

Utility4.7

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time501ms−58ms

first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%−4.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 27anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	27	16–11	59%	0.03
mirage	C	18	8–10	44%	0.01
inferno	B	13	7–6	54%	0.03
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
cache	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	0.01
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,585Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players

5,977Matches

42.0%Match win rate

47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

11.0%Shot accuracy

11,725MVPs

1,744Hours (in match)

4,268Bombs planted

968Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,041

AWP18,122

M4A4 / M4A1-S10,988

Desert Eagle7,161

P2000 / USP-S6,098

SSG 082,388

Knife2,230

Glock-181,874

SG 5531,364

Galil AR952

Lifetime map wins

6,910nuke

5,122dust2

4,419inferno

1,093vertigo

543train

320office

154cbble

49lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

87Matches

57%Win rate

1.58Avg K/D

97.0ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

36%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	26	54%	1.41	18.5
Nuke	15	73%	1.94	20.7
Inferno	11	55%	1.39	19.2
Ancient	9	67%	1.49	16.0
Vertigo	8	38%	1.45	15.4
Dust2	8	75%	1.76	21.9
Anubis	5	40%	1.29	16.2
Overpass	4	50%	2.52	19.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.4%Spray accuracy

75.9%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

503msReaction time

22.1%T opening success

57.3%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

7.48HE damage / grenade

9.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.3981% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.1276% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	3–13	-0.08	7%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.06	7%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	14%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	13%	21 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	10%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.05	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	7%	16 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	8%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	8%	16 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.02	22%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–1	0.10	0%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	10%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	12%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	6%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.03	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	14%	9 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.04	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.10	13%	7 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.04	25%	5 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.04	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	9%	5 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.01	16%	5 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	3%	5 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	17%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.03	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.13	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.04	15%	2 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.06	11%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	21%	1 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	33%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	20%	30 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.12	25%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	14%	29 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	30%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	9%	29 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	15%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.06	28%	28 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	10%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	9%	28 Jul →
boulder	13–11	-0.02	11%	27 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.04	24%	27 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.11	27%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.13	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.15	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.14	23%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	16%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.09	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	12%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	13%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.03	12%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	22%	23 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.05	24%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	27%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	9%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.03	11%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.18	37%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.02	19%	20 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.14	19%	19 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.02	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	20%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.11	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	17 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.03	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.00	13%	16 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	28%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.02	12%	14 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.07	34%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.09	21%	13 Jul →