[Degen] Jorge Dictator — CS2 Stats

76561198346108697[U:1:385842969]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

678Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,313Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,517Blue band · top ~36.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#30101 of 46222 tracked

FaceitLevel 4 · 1,114 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	49.2%	42.7%	44.0%	above
Shot accuracy	9.9%	10.8%	11.6%	1.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.15	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	40.3%	44.1%	45.1%	4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning49

Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6

Aggression7.7

Utility2.3

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning4.9

Utility2.3

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time620ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy15.9%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 11–13

13–2Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

W5Current streak

11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	31	15–16	48%	0.00
nuke	B	24	13–11	54%	0.01
cache	A	13	8–5	62%	0.00
anubis	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
inferno	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,043Lifetime kills

1.15K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

1,795Matches

40.3%Match win rate

49.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players

9.9%Shot accuracy

3,932MVPs

608Hours (in match)

1,304Bombs planted

381Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,611

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,120

AWP2,895

P2000 / USP-S1,960

Desert Eagle1,418

Glock-181,381

Galil AR963

FAMAS800

MP9773

SSG 08538

Lifetime map wins

2,820dust2

1,993nuke

1,406inferno

714train

305vertigo

301lake

219cbble

25office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches

54%Win rate

0.89Avg K/D

81.1ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	20	60%	1.18	17.9
Mirage	17	65%	1.02	14.8
Dust2	13	46%	1.02	16.1
Inferno	8	62%	1.22	17.6
Overpass	7	43%	1.05	15.1
Ancient	5	40%	1.20	17.8
Anubis	5	60%	0.77	13.6
Cache	1	100%	0.47	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.2%Spray accuracy

84.6%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

617msReaction time

36.4%T opening success

52.7%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

8.00HE damage / grenade

1.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3797 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.421% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.06	12%	30 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	18%	30 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	26%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	7%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.07	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	2–10	-0.00	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.07	13%	24 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.03	18%	24 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.08	6%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.12	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	26%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	24%	23 Aug →
cache	11–3	0.01	4%	23 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	12%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	20%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.06	14%	21 Aug →
anubis	11–4	-0.00	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	8%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	10%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	21%	18 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	9%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	12%	17 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	13%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.10	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	25%	17 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.09	15%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	17%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	20%	17 Aug →
anubis	12–12	-0.03	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.05	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–7	0.02	16%	16 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	6%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	26%	16 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	9%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	13%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	11%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	12%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.10	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	20%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	15%	10 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	10 Aug →
nuke	1–13	0.01	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	6%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	12%	9 Aug →
ancient	6–1	0.06	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	29%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	28%	9 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	15%	6 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	21%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	27%	6 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	18%	5 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	22%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.01	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	14%	1 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	15%	1 Aug →
cache	7–0	0.04	29%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	13%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	10%	1 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	18%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	14%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.05	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	-0.06	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.00	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	14%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.06	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	24%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	23%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.00	20%	23 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	13%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	16%	20 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.05	14%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	22%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	34%	19 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.05	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.00	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–2	-0.03	0%	19 Jul →