ferbian — CS2 Stats
76561198344096487[U:1:383830759]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Purple band median | Pink band median | vs Pink band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 56.9% | 44.1% | 47.2% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 7.5% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 5.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.07 short |
| Match win rate | 46.1% | 45.2% | 46.6% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 74 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 23 | 11–12 | 48% | 0.00 |
 nuke | C | 22 | 9–13 | 41% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.01 |
 cache | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.02 |
 inferno | C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.01 |
 ancient | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.06 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.00 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.04 |
Across the last 74 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 2 | 0% | 1.16 | 28.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 100% | 1.67 | 15.0 |
| Inferno | 1 | 0% | 0.46 | 6.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.9949% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.06 | 30% | 29 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.01 | 23% | 24 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.02 | 20% | 24 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | -0.02 | 14% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 0–2 | 0.04 | 0% | 15 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–16 | 0.03 | 26% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | 0.07 | 25% | 14 Aug → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 13 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.06 | 30% | 13 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–0 | 0.15 | 32% | 13 Aug → | |
| cache | 16–12 | 0.03 | 23% | 12 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | -0.06 | 20% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.05 | 20% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.02 | 20% | 2 Aug → | |
| inferno | 2–13 | -0.09 | 13% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.10 | 27% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 1 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 25 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | 0.07 | 29% | 18 Jul → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.02 | 29% | 18 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | -0.04 | 11% | 13 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.05 | 24% | 13 Jul → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 11 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.03 | 19% | 11 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.03 | 16% | 11 Jul → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.05 | 22% | 11 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.06 | 37% | 11 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–6 | 0.04 | 39% | 11 Jul → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.01 | 21% | 11 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.01 | 34% | 11 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 15–15 | -0.03 | 25% | 11 Jul → | |
| cache | 8–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 10 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | -0.00 | 32% | 9 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.09 | 28% | 3 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–16 | 0.00 | 20% | 30 Jun → | |
| overpass | 10–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 30 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.01 | 12% | 29 Jun → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | 0.01 | 12% | 29 Jun → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | 0.03 | 19% | 28 Jun → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | 0.01 | 13% | 28 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 5–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.00 | 39% | 21 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.11 | 21% | 21 Jun → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.07 | 19% | 21 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.02 | 13% | 20 Jun → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 20 Jun → | |
| ancient | 7–8 | 0.06 | 12% | 20 Jun → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.01 | 43% | 19 Jun → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 3 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.00 | 23% | 18 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.01 | 33% | 18 Jan → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 16 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 14–16 | 0.00 | 21% | 12 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 10 Jan → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.00 | 18% | 10 Jan → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.06 | 47% | 11 Sept → | |
| nuke | 15–15 | -0.02 | 23% | 12 Jul → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | 0.03 | 37% | 13 Dec → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 4 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.04 | 17% | 29 Dec → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.00 | 8% | 16 Dec → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.01 | 9% | 16 Dec → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.05 | 25% | 16 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.04 | 18% | 20 Nov → | |
| nuke | 9–5 | 0.04 | 25% | 4 Jul → | |
| nuke | 12–16 | -0.03 | 10% | 31 May → | |
| nuke | 16–7 | 0.05 | 18% | 31 May → | |
| nuke | 16–10 | -0.02 | 23% | 22 May → | |
| mirage | 16–9 | 0.05 | 13% | 18 May → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | -0.01 | 25% | 16 May → | |
| nuke | 9–3 | 0.08 | 13% | 10 May → | |
| mirage | 4–9 | -0.03 | 27% | 9 May → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.02 | 13% | 3 May → | |
| dust2 | 3–9 | -0.10 | 14% | 2 May → |
Match data via Leetify.