samE

samE — CS2 Stats

EG76561198335744078[U:1:375478350]Steam profile ↗

829Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating17,216Purple band · top ~19.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12875 of 23001 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsamEFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,216 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning71
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.1
Aggression10.0
Utility4.4
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time523ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 21infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%0.03
nukeA2112957%0.03
cacheA169756%0.02
anubisB158753%0.04
dust2D123925%0.02
infernoD92722%0.05
ancient21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

92Matches
52%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
98.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2343%1.3519.6
Anubis1644%1.4621.6
Nuke1369%1.6820.8
Cache1283%1.5022.6
Dust21145%1.1519.6
Ancient944%1.2017.8
Inferno729%1.1820.7
Overpass1100%2.2011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
518msReaction time
46.6%T opening success
64.9%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
4.69HE damage / grenade
8.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4401 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0533%26 Aug
dust212–160.0026%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0625%25 Aug
nuke5–5-0.0215%25 Aug
cache8–13-0.0327%24 Aug
mirage13–40.0519%24 Aug
anubis16–130.0915%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0432%23 Aug
inferno10–130.0117%23 Aug
dust29–8-0.0110%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0518%22 Aug
anubis13–50.1315%22 Aug
cache13–90.1118%22 Aug
nuke13–00.1925%22 Aug
inferno3–130.0427%22 Aug
cache13–6-0.0214%22 Aug
mirage16–120.0813%22 Aug
nuke8–130.002%21 Aug
anubis13–40.0621%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0413%21 Aug
cache13–11-0.0910%20 Aug
inferno10–130.079%20 Aug
nuke13–70.1023%20 Aug
anubis11–130.1115%20 Aug
nuke13–20.0218%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0520%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0516%18 Aug
dust213–40.0217%18 Aug
cache3–60.0610%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0024%18 Aug
nuke13–70.0819%13 Aug
anubis10–130.0119%12 Aug
mirage0–11-0.0122%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0618%12 Aug
mirage13–90.1019%11 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0510%11 Aug
anubis13–110.1021%10 Aug
mirage13–70.2221%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0115%10 Aug
anubis9–130.0111%10 Aug
mirage13–70.0113%10 Aug
cache13–100.0318%9 Aug
anubis13–50.023%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0422%8 Aug
cache3–13-0.0611%8 Aug
dust213–100.0413%7 Aug
inferno9–130.0626%7 Aug
mirage7–130.0326%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0413%7 Aug
mirage14–160.1229%7 Aug
nuke13–30.0619%7 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0116%6 Aug
nuke7–12-0.0310%6 Aug
inferno8–130.0321%5 Aug
cache13–160.0217%5 Aug
cache7–13-0.0618%4 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0113%3 Aug
nuke13–100.0711%3 Aug
cache13–50.0533%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0632%2 Aug
inferno19–150.0610%2 Aug
anubis13–60.1317%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0010%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0112%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0117%2 Aug
cache13–80.1118%1 Aug
mirage13–70.0321%1 Aug
dust213–110.0418%1 Aug
anubis8–130.0020%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0211%1 Aug
cache13–70.0326%1 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0324%31 Jul
cache5–130.0219%31 Jul
dust210–130.0919%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0323%31 Jul
nuke13–100.1018%31 Jul
dust210–130.029%30 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0118%30 Jul
dust210–130.0220%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0228%30 Jul
nuke14–160.0227%30 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0131%30 Jul
nuke13–30.0117%30 Jul
cache13–10.0520%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0014%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0344%28 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0511%28 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0121%28 Jul
nuke13–70.0320%28 Jul
nuke13–90.1725%27 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0613%27 Jul
mirage13–30.0932%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0026%27 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0114%17 Jul
inferno12–120.0530%16 Jul
dust27–130.0424%16 Jul
dust212–120.0022%16 Jul
inferno13–70.1235%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0623%15 Jul
cache13–30.0322%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →