DIH666 — CS2 Stats

76561198333018254[U:1:372752526]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,322Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

11,614Hours in CS75Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,599Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7657 of 53904 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,850 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	56.6%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	14.4%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.23	1.08
Match win rate	47.3%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning62

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression9.1

Utility4.7

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.2

Utility4.7

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact4.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time505ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy26.0%+4.4%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–1Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	20	10–10	50%	0.01
mirage	C	18	8–10	44%	0.03
dust2	C	17	7–10	41%	0.01
nuke	S	15	11–4	73%	0.03
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
inferno	D	5	1–4	20%	0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

396,561Lifetime kills

1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

16,149Matches

47.3%Match win rate

56.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

71,134MVPs

4,852Hours (in match)

6,936Bombs planted

2,789Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47164,596

Desert Eagle54,555

M4A4 / M4A1-S53,416

P2000 / USP-S34,983

AWP33,062

Glock-1814,570

SSG 0810,623

Galil AR6,334

FAMAS4,326

Knife2,992

Lifetime map wins

12,559inferno

10,203dust2

8,921vertigo

8,749nuke

5,940train

2,637cbble

1,800office

1,344lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,133Matches

53%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

91.4ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	154	55%	1.34	18.3
Anubis	123	54%	1.34	19.5
Ancient	95	59%	1.22	17.4
Dust2	64	53%	1.31	18.9
Nuke	57	42%	1.13	17.8
Inferno	31	48%	1.36	19.2
Vertigo	27	59%	1.26	18.9
Cache	22	64%	1.30	19.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

47.0%Spray accuracy

85.0%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

504msReaction time

36.6%T opening success

55.7%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

5.56HE damage / grenade

6.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.6448% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	7–13	-0.03	18%	30 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.02	36%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	21%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.08	25%	30 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	13%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	30%	29 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	32%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	21%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	24%	28 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	18%	28 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.08	30%	28 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	26%	27 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	44%	27 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.02	44%	27 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	23%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	26%	27 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	28%	27 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.02	18%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	30%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.20	35%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	37%	26 Aug →
italy	12–12	0.04	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	40%	25 Aug →
shelter	13–4	0.08	35%	23 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.09	16%	23 Aug →
overpass	6–13	0.01	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	22%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	27%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.08	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.02	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	21%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.05	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	19%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	28%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.12	29%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	17%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.05	36%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	26%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	22%	18 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.11	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	34%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.10	30%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.12	33%	18 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	29%	18 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.08	29%	17 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	34%	17 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.06	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	20%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.04	35%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	26%	15 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	35%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	24%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	8%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	22%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	16%	13 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	28%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	24%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	20%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	30%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	27%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.15	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	31%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	15%	6 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	9%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.06	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.11	24%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	12%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	28%	5 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	23%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	24%	5 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	22%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	23%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.05	26%	4 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	12%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	17%	4 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.04	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.10	11%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.03	10%	4 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.04	37%	4 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	27%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	23%	3 Aug →