Kneelander — CS2 Stats

76561198330378034[U:1:370112306]

308Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
876Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,302Purple band · top ~15.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10663 of 20478 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.5%48.1%6.6% short
Shot accuracy7.6%12.9%5.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.080.09 short
Match win rate27.8%46.5%18.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKneelanderPREMIER18,302 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning41
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression3.1
Utility5.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time634ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — overpass
7Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%-0.01
ancientS1913668%0.01
dust2D1651131%-0.01
overpassS139469%0.02
cacheD93633%-0.01
anubisA74357%-0.01
infernoD62433%-0.01
nuke32167%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,102Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,886Matches
27.8%Match win rate
41.5%Headshot %
7.6%Shot accuracy
3,396MVPs
876Hours (in match)
1,942Bombs planted
816Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,450dust2
1,195inferno
971nuke
662vertigo
441train
65cbble
34lake
28office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
634msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
14.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0821%2 Jul
mirage13–50.0816%2 Jul
dust213–70.1240%21 Jun
ancient13–7-0.026%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0314%21 Jun
overpass13–10.0917%21 Jun
ancient7–13-0.009%15 Jun
cache11–13-0.0120%13 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0527%13 Jun
overpass11–130.0218%13 Jun
anubis13–70.0312%13 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0618%12 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0312%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0615%30 May
nuke8–13-0.0220%30 May
ancient13–70.0419%29 May
ancient13–90.0021%29 May
mirage16–13-0.0111%28 May
inferno3–13-0.0312%23 May
mirage3–130.0015%23 May
overpass13–80.0016%23 May
overpass13–110.0012%23 May
nuke13–70.0325%23 May
ancient7–13-0.0016%21 May
dust27–13-0.0311%20 May
mirage11–13-0.0218%20 May
overpass5–130.0620%19 May
dust210–130.0114%19 May
mirage4–13-0.1221%19 May
ancient13–9-0.0310%17 May
anubis13–100.0113%17 May
mirage13–100.0214%16 May
dust213–90.017%16 May
overpass13–7-0.0111%16 May
mirage13–50.0314%16 May
mirage13–80.1017%14 May
mirage9–13-0.068%14 May
inferno6–13-0.0418%14 May
ancient13–9-0.009%14 May
ancient16–130.0724%13 May
ancient16–14-0.0319%13 May
dust26–13-0.0113%12 May
mirage11–13-0.0114%12 May
dust210–13-0.060%12 May
overpass12–160.0119%11 May
mirage11–130.0120%11 May
ancient7–13-0.0117%11 May
overpass13–3-0.0111%11 May
dust24–13-0.1215%11 May
inferno7–10.0714%11 May
ancient13–8-0.0310%11 May
mirage13–7-0.0218%9 May
anubis8–13-0.0511%9 May
inferno13–7-0.0112%9 May
ancient11–13-0.0315%9 May
overpass13–10-0.0311%9 May
anubis13–7-0.004%9 May
ancient15–15-0.048%9 May
overpass13–110.0211%8 May
cache5–13-0.0822%8 May
cache12–120.0310%8 May
cache4–13-0.049%8 May
cache13–10.0317%7 May
cache13–20.0014%7 May
cache10–130.0211%6 May
ancient13–30.1116%6 May
cache13–2-0.009%5 May
dust213–100.0214%5 May
mirage13–11-0.0218%5 May
dust27–13-0.057%4 May
mirage16–14-0.0314%4 May
anubis14–16-0.019%4 May
mirage8–13-0.0114%3 May
mirage13–70.0415%3 May
mirage7–130.0215%3 May
dust213–10.0720%3 May
ancient13–10.0712%3 May
overpass13–20.0523%3 May
mirage13–60.0515%2 May
overpass9–130.0116%2 May
overpass13–8-0.0212%2 May
dust27–13-0.046%2 May
inferno5–13-0.0414%2 May
ancient13–30.0313%2 May
dust28–13-0.0123%2 May
mirage4–13-0.0517%2 May
mirage15–15-0.0311%2 May
ancient13–5-0.0117%2 May
anubis9–13-0.048%2 May
mirage2–13-0.048%1 May
nuke16–13-0.098%30 Apr
dust213–9-0.0213%30 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0710%30 Apr
ancient13–160.0012%30 Apr
mirage13–3-0.025%30 Apr
dust29–13-0.0218%30 Apr
dust213–16-0.036%29 Apr
ancient13–110.0113%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0112%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0217%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →