Baba Yaga

Baba Yaga — CS2 Stats

76561198326357124[U:1:366091396]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

994Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,167Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate53.3%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy14.1%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.841.000.990.16 short
Match win rate37.2%42.9%43.9%6.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBaba YagaFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning44
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression5.8
Utility6.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time606ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–9
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%0.02
dust2C25111444%0.00
infernoA159660%0.01
ancientB136746%-0.00
nukeS64267%0.03
anubisC52340%0.01
overpassC52340%0.01
cache2020%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,961Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,464Matches
37.2%Match win rate
53.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
4,735MVPs
3,167Hours (in match)
2,313Bombs planted
696Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,108dust2
3,512inferno
1,662vertigo
1,598nuke
950train
282lake
37cbble
16safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
612msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
11.39HE damage / grenade
12.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.06% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0810%1 Aug
nuke8–130.0017%27 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0426%16 Jul
nuke13–110.0532%16 Jul
dust213–70.1022%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0214%13 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0015%12 Jul
cache6–130.0411%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0814%12 Jul
dust27–130.0439%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0110%10 Jul
ancient13–110.0417%9 Jul
inferno1–13-0.1020%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.0213%9 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0015%9 Jul
mirage13–60.1123%9 Jul
overpass9–130.0216%30 Jun
inferno13–50.0213%30 Jun
inferno16–140.0324%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.0817%30 Jun
dust213–10-0.0515%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0315%30 Jun
mirage13–60.0634%25 Jun
dust24–13-0.0616%25 Jun
ancient5–130.0116%25 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0117%25 Jun
anubis13–70.0316%22 Jun
anubis13–70.0724%22 Jun
mirage13–10.0523%21 Jun
dust29–130.0221%21 Jun
dust25–130.0220%21 Jun
dust213–90.0717%17 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0319%17 Jun
nuke13–160.0317%16 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0217%16 Jun
ancient13–50.0231%16 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0331%15 Jun
mirage0–13-0.049%15 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0023%15 Jun
dust211–130.0117%14 Jun
ancient13–110.0321%14 Jun
dust213–10-0.0517%14 Jun
mirage13–110.0621%14 Jun
dust213–8-0.0323%14 Jun
dust213–100.0111%13 Jun
dust27–130.0018%13 Jun
inferno13–30.0421%13 Jun
inferno9–130.1120%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0011%13 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0517%3 Jun
overpass9–130.1119%31 May
ancient9–13-0.0219%31 May
inferno13–100.0319%30 May
inferno11–13-0.0122%30 May
dust28–13-0.0610%30 May
mirage13–90.1120%30 May
mirage6–130.0521%30 May
inferno5–13-0.0131%28 May
mirage8–13-0.0329%28 May
mirage8–130.0116%27 May
inferno13–80.0924%27 May
nuke13–110.0419%25 May
ancient11–130.0311%25 May
overpass13–11-0.0413%24 May
dust25–13-0.0015%24 May
inferno13–60.0324%24 May
dust27–13-0.0620%24 May
mirage13–100.0119%24 May
mirage5–13-0.0115%22 May
mirage3–70.0618%22 May
mirage6–13-0.0124%22 May
mirage8–130.0725%22 May
anubis4–13-0.0215%22 May
mirage2–13-0.0727%22 May
overpass16–14-0.0312%20 May
inferno13–40.0116%20 May
dust213–110.1120%20 May
dust27–13-0.0213%20 May
nuke13–10.0422%18 May
dust210–13-0.0335%18 May
mirage13–00.0014%18 May
dust216–140.0219%17 May
mirage13–30.0514%17 May
ancient13–10-0.0618%17 May
anubis11–13-0.0538%17 May
dust21–13-0.0415%17 May
ancient13–40.0114%17 May
dust28–13-0.0418%16 May
inferno13–80.0137%16 May
mirage7–130.0119%16 May
inferno6–13-0.0521%16 May
dust213–70.0527%16 May
inferno13–8-0.0028%16 May
mirage13–30.0211%16 May
dust213–100.0425%16 May
mirage15–150.0519%15 May
mirage13–100.028%15 May
mirage13–11-0.0317%15 May
mirage13–70.0511%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0914%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →