馬切伊是個失敗者。

馬切伊是個失敗者。 — CS2 Stats

76561198323299932[U:1:363034204]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,355Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating20,044Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10823 of 26375 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,100 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG馬切伊是個失敗者。FACEITLevel 10 · 2,100 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,044 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning63
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.3
Aggression10.0
Utility3.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.3
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time515ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — train 13–2
131Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 90% over 10infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1861233%0.03
mirageB189950%0.05
dust2C146843%0.00
cacheA127558%0.04
trainS109190%0.07
anubisC104640%-0.01
ancientS86275%0.00
infernoD61517%0.03
overpass2020%0.02
vertigo220100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

878Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
77.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21755%1.1516.4
Dust214051%1.0715.9
Anubis8039%1.0415.9
Inferno7453%1.2015.9
Ancient6549%1.1415.8
Nuke6456%1.1616.6
Train3053%1.1418.2
Overpass1354%1.1616.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
507msReaction time
43.1%T opening success
69.3%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
3.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2702 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass10–130.0325%28 Aug
cache11–130.0429%27 Aug
vertigo13–20.0719%27 Aug
train13–20.1623%26 Aug
train13–30.1135%25 Aug
train13–10-0.0123%22 Aug
nuke12–120.0824%21 Aug
train13–40.0644%20 Aug
train13–60.0135%20 Aug
cache6–130.0228%20 Aug
train13–10.1335%19 Aug
train13–20.0834%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0127%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0114%16 Aug
inferno11–130.0633%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0229%15 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0021%12 Aug
cache13–110.0524%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0325%8 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0119%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0528%6 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0228%6 Aug
dust213–8-0.0333%5 Aug
dust222–190.0225%3 Aug
train13–100.0658%2 Aug
anubis13–30.1233%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0632%1 Aug
cache13–10-0.0126%31 Jul
train5–00.1067%31 Jul
cache13–50.050%29 Jul
inferno10–130.0233%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0321%29 Jul
mirage13–80.1316%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0144%28 Jul
mirage15–150.1124%22 Jul
nuke13–100.0530%22 Jul
cache13–110.0416%21 Jul
nuke10–130.0723%20 Jul
mirage13–20.1439%19 Jul
nuke7–130.0529%19 Jul
cache15–150.0632%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0341%16 Jul
nuke13–80.1218%14 Jul
cache10–130.0124%13 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0123%12 Jul
mirage13–10.0915%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0117%12 Jul
mirage6–130.0416%12 Jul
cache13–70.0417%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.0211%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0418%11 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0422%11 Jul
nuke9–130.0638%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0314%11 Jul
dust215–150.0722%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0719%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0312%10 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0727%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0418%10 Jul
cache13–70.0930%9 Jul
cache12–120.0635%4 Jul
vertigo13–80.0622%4 Jul
ancient13–60.0924%3 Jul
nuke13–80.0917%29 Jun
anubis13–60.0529%24 Jun
ancient13–60.0212%24 Jun
mirage8–130.0228%24 Jun
mirage1–8-0.0725%23 Jun
inferno11–130.0332%22 Jun
dust216–12-0.0122%22 Jun
dust210–130.0125%20 Jun
ancient0–13-0.080%20 Jun
mirage10–130.0318%19 Jun
train11–130.0234%17 Jun
dust25–13-0.0121%17 Jun
nuke7–130.0519%17 Jun
mirage8–130.0224%17 Jun
inferno13–100.0547%15 Jun
dust21–13-0.0238%15 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0314%14 Jun
dust213–30.0421%14 Jun
mirage15–150.0411%13 Jun
dust28–13-0.0231%13 Jun
anubis10–130.0035%12 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0214%11 Jun
ancient13–110.0224%11 Jun
dust28–13-0.0221%8 Jun
nuke13–40.0328%7 Jun
mirage16–140.0518%7 Jun
ancient0–13-0.050%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.0116%5 Jun
inferno2–130.0630%5 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0728%4 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0214%4 Jun
dust213–110.0329%21 May
mirage13–10.0721%21 May
nuke13–80.1229%21 May
nuke9–130.0617%20 May
overpass7–130.0113%19 May
dust213–50.0621%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →