✪ OshaViolation

✪ OshaViolation — CS2 Stats

76561198320132888[U:1:359867160]Steam profile ↗

1,556Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,272Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,916Blue band · top ~44.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25712 of 37079 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 955 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate32.4%44.9%46.2%13.9% short
Shot accuracy13.9%11.8%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.041.06above
Match win rate45.9%45.3%45.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ OshaViolationFACEITLevel 6 · 955 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER11,916 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38557Last 10038%Win rateLLLLWLWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.09 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression9.0
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time551ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — anubis 13–1
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 13ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2191243%0.02
infernoA1811761%0.03
dust2D1631319%-0.01
mirageA138562%0.03
anubisC114736%0.03
vertigoD102820%0.02
ancientD5050%0.06
italy21150%0.05
cache2020%0.02
train1010%-0.01
office1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,274Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,391Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
32.4%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
11,663MVPs
1,738Hours (in match)
2,765Bombs planted
1,102Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP25,411
AK-4724,323
SSG 081,711
MP91,281
P901,235
MAC-101,196

Lifetime map wins

6,357inferno
2,528train
2,526nuke
2,012dust2
1,768vertigo
1,027cbble
886office
253italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
57%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
86.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1258%1.3616.5
Nuke1258%1.4418.3
Mirage771%1.2416.3
Anubis757%1.2019.4
Dust2560%1.0915.4
Cache20%1.1620.0
Ancient10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
558msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
5.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2168% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6897% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo6–13-0.0612%29 Aug
nuke1–130.008%29 Aug
inferno13–160.0312%29 Aug
ancient7–130.036%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0113%28 Aug
vertigo2–130.0114%28 Aug
vertigo13–60.027%27 Aug
italy13–80.136%27 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0013%27 Aug
mirage7–130.048%25 Aug
dust24–130.0816%25 Aug
anubis9–130.0820%25 Aug
nuke13–10.0717%25 Aug
nuke13–60.1617%25 Aug
inferno13–100.1318%24 Aug
dust27–130.1317%24 Aug
mirage13–90.1013%24 Aug
mirage6–130.098%24 Aug
nuke6–130.0714%24 Aug
anubis13–10.206%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0124%23 Aug
mirage16–140.0110%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0613%22 Aug
nuke8–130.075%22 Aug
nuke3–13-0.048%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0824%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0326%21 Aug
nuke3–130.0230%21 Aug
ancient12–120.1119%21 Aug
inferno13–50.1025%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0027%21 Aug
anubis5–130.0813%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.046%20 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0314%20 Aug
dust28–130.0221%20 Aug
mirage12–16-0.089%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0216%20 Aug
nuke0–20.000%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0315%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0914%18 Aug
train12–12-0.018%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0010%18 Aug
inferno13–80.036%18 Aug
anubis13–40.039%17 Aug
nuke13–30.0317%17 Aug
vertigo9–130.0518%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0712%16 Aug
nuke12–120.0714%16 Aug
anubis4–13-0.015%16 Aug
nuke0–2-0.020%16 Aug
italy8–13-0.0212%16 Aug
mirage13–80.037%14 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0815%12 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0912%12 Aug
nuke7–130.0621%12 Aug
inferno13–10.0131%12 Aug
ancient7–130.1214%11 Aug
dust28–130.0513%11 Aug
nuke13–90.1113%11 Aug
anubis13–70.0912%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.037%9 Aug
inferno8–13-0.047%9 Aug
mirage6–130.0121%9 Aug
anubis13–70.0124%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0213%9 Aug
inferno11–30.1021%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0213%9 Aug
ancient8–130.088%8 Aug
dust22–13-0.089%8 Aug
vertigo13–60.1317%8 Aug
anubis7–130.0313%8 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0113%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.058%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0119%2 Aug
inferno16–140.0413%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0615%2 Aug
nuke9–130.0512%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0112%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0310%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.088%1 Aug
vertigo12–120.013%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.075%1 Aug
vertigo1–80.0211%1 Aug
cache8–130.0514%28 Jul
inferno4–9-0.033%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0312%27 Jul
nuke16–130.0115%27 Jul
inferno13–70.0214%27 Jul
dust216–12-0.0114%27 Jul
cache3–13-0.0125%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0228%26 Jul
dust212–120.054%26 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0619%26 Jul
inferno13–90.026%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0615%26 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0313%25 Jul
office2–130.0643%25 Jul
vertigo11–130.1116%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0810%23 Jul
nuke13–2-0.103%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →