QUICK — CS2 Stats

76561198317916412[U:1:357650684]✓ No bans

1,155Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,167 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning51

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression6.3

Utility5.9

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning5.1

Utility5.9

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time592ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	25	9–16	36%	-0.01
dust2	D	14	4–10	29%	0.00
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
anubis	S	13	9–4	69%	0.01
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	0.00
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches

55%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

65.3ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	42	62%	0.88	12.9
Dust2	38	53%	0.96	13.8
Nuke	20	80%	1.05	14.1
Ancient	12	58%	0.93	12.4
Anubis	12	58%	1.05	13.2
Vertigo	8	25%	0.73	11.0
Inferno	3	0%	0.56	9.0
Train	1	100%	0.95	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy

31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.4%Spray accuracy

77.9%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

603msReaction time

35.7%T opening success

43.4%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

10.38HE damage / grenade

10.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4528 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.6668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	17–19	0.03	22%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.07	23%	27 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.00	15%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.09	22%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	22%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.07	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	13%	15 Aug →
overpass	13–6	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	17%	12 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	18%	12 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	18%	12 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	15%	12 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	18%	12 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.07	15%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	7%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.07	21%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.03	23%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	27%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	24%	6 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.08	16%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	35%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.05	15%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.11	9%	1 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	13%	1 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.04	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	9%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	19%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	23%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	20%	31 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	10%	31 Jul →
cache	9–4	0.07	21%	31 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	3–7	-0.04	0%	19 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.10	6%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	30%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	8%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	8%	18 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.08	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	10%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	21%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	18%	16 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	18%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	30%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	26%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	25%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	24%	15 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	12%	15 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.07	23%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	15%	14 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.07	25%	14 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	20%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	10%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	14%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	16%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	20%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	23%	5 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	20%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.10	23%	22 Jun →
nuke	16–12	-0.00	22%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.03	20%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.05	22%	20 Jun →
overpass	16–14	-0.03	12%	9 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.01	15%	8 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	16%	8 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.00	6%	8 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	14%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.05	17%	4 Jun →
nuke	16–14	0.02	13%	3 Jun →
overpass	8–13	0.05	20%	20 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	19 May →
mirage	12–16	0.07	14%	17 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	17%	17 May →
anubis	6–13	0.01	14%	16 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	19%	16 May →
mirage	13–3	0.05	24%	16 May →
anubis	12–16	-0.04	10%	13 May →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	23%	13 May →
anubis	16–13	0.05	13%	13 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	28%	13 May →
overpass	4–13	-0.06	17%	13 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	10%	12 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	7%	12 May →
dust2	13–4	0.04	5%	12 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.09	19%	12 May →