THE BOX

THE BOX — CS2 Stats

US76561198317013059[U:1:356747331]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

686Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating21,381Pink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7653 of 21764 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTHE BOXFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,381 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning57
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44479Last 10044%Win rateWWWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.6
Utility2.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.7
Utility2.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time631ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — train 13–2
132Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 9dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1851328%-0.02
nukeB168850%-0.02
infernoC145936%-0.03
cacheB105550%-0.02
ancientA95456%0.01
anubisD61517%-0.03
dust2D5050%-0.04
boulder42250%0.01
overpass42250%-0.00
vertigo330100%-0.00
fachwerk330100%0.02
warden31233%0.04
italy110100%0.04
shelter110100%-0.05
alpine110100%0.02
train110100%0.16
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
54%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
80.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage667%0.8412.2
Nuke425%0.6815.8
Ancient3100%1.0321.0
Inferno367%1.1715.7
Vertigo1100%0.7311.0
Overpass10%1.2327.0
Anubis1100%1.4014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
634msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
9.65HE damage / grenade
1.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2848 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1212% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0114%17 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.016%16 Aug
fachwerk13–10-0.0215%14 Aug
boulder13–70.027%14 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0115%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0610%8 Aug
nuke6–13-0.098%8 Aug
fachwerk13–50.0327%8 Aug
boulder10–13-0.0127%7 Aug
fachwerk13–100.0518%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0726%2 Aug
ancient10–130.0319%2 Aug
italy13–50.0436%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0823%2 Aug
boulder9–130.0039%2 Aug
boulder13–50.0145%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0730%2 Aug
dust26–130.0239%2 Aug
shelter13–10-0.0548%2 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0513%28 Jul
inferno4–00.0110%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0716%27 Jul
anubis6–13-0.049%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0232%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0922%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0438%16 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0322%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0813%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0320%16 Jul
ancient13–90.0218%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0624%16 Jul
inferno16–140.0126%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0619%15 Jul
inferno13–6-0.1036%15 Jul
cache6–130.016%15 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0415%15 Jul
nuke13–70.0317%15 Jul
cache13–8-0.0218%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0130%9 Jul
ancient7–130.0124%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0518%8 Jul
alpine13–80.0227%2 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0417%26 Jun
dust27–13-0.0510%26 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0619%24 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0617%11 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0239%3 Jun
ancient15–15-0.094%3 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0117%2 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0210%1 Jun
anubis14–16-0.049%1 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0324%1 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0312%1 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0622%31 May
mirage11–13-0.046%31 May
nuke11–13-0.0222%31 May
mirage13–90.059%31 May
cache13–80.0146%31 May
mirage10–130.0219%31 May
nuke10–13-0.0127%31 May
mirage13–3-0.0421%31 May
overpass9–130.0217%31 May
inferno7–130.0315%30 May
nuke13–70.0222%30 May
overpass13–100.0720%30 May
ancient13–30.1015%30 May
nuke13–80.0312%30 May
mirage13–160.0118%29 May
nuke13–7-0.087%29 May
vertigo13–11-0.0317%26 May
anubis12–12-0.0518%25 May
inferno10–130.0236%25 May
cache13–5-0.0218%25 May
vertigo13–90.0317%25 May
nuke13–10-0.0338%25 May
dust210–13-0.0414%25 May
inferno3–13-0.0518%24 May
nuke13–2-0.0152%24 May
warden9–13-0.0210%24 May
cache4–13-0.078%24 May
mirage13–8-0.0039%23 May
cache12–12-0.0252%23 May
warden13–20.1025%23 May
inferno12–12-0.0920%23 May
train13–20.1619%23 May
dust21–13-0.0623%23 May
nuke10–13-0.0320%23 May
office12–12-0.0117%23 May
mirage11–13-0.0111%16 May
inferno5–13-0.1016%16 May
warden12–120.0616%16 May
nuke12–12-0.0121%16 May
cache3–13-0.0526%16 May
mirage7–130.0323%16 May
cache13–40.0443%15 May
inferno13–80.0210%10 May
mirage15–15-0.099%10 May
dust27–13-0.085%8 May
mirage4–13-0.0338%8 May
nuke6–130.0133%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →