CoinFarmer278

CoinFarmer278 — CS2 Stats

76561198292017118[U:1:331751390]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,039Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,164Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5092 of 20703 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoinFarmer278FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,164 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41527Last 10041%Win rateLLLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression8.8
Utility4.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time630ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — nuke 7–0
132Biggest win — vertigo
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 12cacheWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%0.02
cacheD1421214%-0.01
infernoB126650%-0.00
ancientC104640%0.02
nukeB105550%0.04
anubisD103730%0.01
fachwerkB63350%0.08
boulder42250%0.02
dust24040%0.02
vertigo330100%0.07
italy21150%0.07
office2020%0.01
shelter110100%0.12
overpass110100%-0.04
train1010%0.14
alpine110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
55%Win rate
1.44Avg K/D
99.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass250%1.5321.0
Anubis250%2.1422.0
Vertigo1100%2.9029.0
Nuke10%0.8814.0
Mirage1100%1.6922.0
Ancient1100%2.0024.0
Inferno10%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
620msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
10.15HE damage / grenade
5.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4783 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0524%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0222%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0512%22 Aug
ancient13–100.0516%17 Aug
vertigo13–110.1023%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0224%14 Aug
fachwerk13–100.0629%14 Aug
boulder13–70.0222%14 Aug
vertigo13–20.1324%13 Aug
fachwerk8–130.0241%12 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0131%12 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0034%12 Aug
nuke5–130.0419%11 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0627%8 Aug
anubis5–130.0015%8 Aug
nuke6–130.0521%8 Aug
boulder10–130.0621%7 Aug
fachwerk13–50.1533%4 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0338%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0126%3 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0612%2 Aug
italy13–50.1437%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0925%2 Aug
boulder9–13-0.0128%2 Aug
boulder13–50.0323%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0419%2 Aug
shelter13–100.1224%2 Aug
mirage4–130.0331%30 Jul
dust28–130.0520%30 Jul
fachwerk13–110.2033%30 Jul
cache4–13-0.0528%30 Jul
fachwerk11–13-0.0227%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0428%29 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0911%28 Jul
inferno4–00.0118%28 Jul
mirage15–150.0720%27 Jul
anubis6–130.0129%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0735%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0219%26 Jul
fachwerk11–130.0527%25 Jul
cache5–130.0520%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0823%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0213%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0423%25 Jul
anubis13–90.0412%25 Jul
anubis6–130.0829%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0125%22 Jul
inferno9–130.0447%22 Jul
inferno16–140.0444%21 Jul
mirage7–130.0146%21 Jul
ancient13–30.1031%20 Jul
cache11–130.0117%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0329%20 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0036%20 Jul
dust211–130.0829%20 Jul
dust25–130.0020%20 Jul
anubis13–100.0529%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0228%19 Jul
nuke12–120.0442%19 Jul
cache13–80.0219%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0138%16 Jul
mirage13–50.1035%16 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0219%15 Jul
inferno13–60.0923%15 Jul
cache6–13-0.0422%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0720%15 Jul
nuke13–70.0021%15 Jul
inferno5–130.0130%14 Jul
anubis10–130.0625%14 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0126%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0224%12 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0023%11 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0223%11 Jul
ancient14–160.0423%11 Jul
inferno13–100.0231%11 Jul
nuke10–130.0223%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0422%11 Jul
nuke6–3-0.016%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0839%11 Jul
office4–13-0.0450%11 Jul
italy1–130.0024%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0916%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0219%8 Jul
nuke7–00.2323%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.0210%8 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0412%8 Jul
anubis12–120.0116%7 Jul
mirage9–130.0228%7 Jul
ancient13–80.0645%7 Jul
train9–130.1428%7 Jul
cache10–130.0031%7 Jul
office6–130.0527%6 Jul
cache12–120.0222%6 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0237%6 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0414%3 Jul
ancient4–130.0120%3 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0521%3 Jul
alpine13–80.1527%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0127%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →