TKXX-DszEe — CS2 Stats
CN76561198312660162[U:1:352394434]Steam profile ↗
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 3 median | Level 4 median | vs Level 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 39.1% | 42.2% | 42.7% | 3.6% short |
| Shot accuracy | 18.2% | 11.9% | 10.8% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.00 | meets |
| Match win rate | 47.5% | 43.6% | 44.1% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 34 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | D | 10 | 3–7 | 30% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | 0.01 |
 inferno | S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | -0.02 |
 ancient | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.01 |
 nuke | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.02 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.01 |
 vertigo | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
Across the last 34 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 8 | 50% | 0.94 | 14.4 |
| Mirage | 4 | 0% | 0.66 | 12.8 |
| Ancient | 4 | 50% | 1.14 | 17.8 |
| Dust2 | 3 | 33% | 1.12 | 14.7 |
| Nuke | 1 | 0% | 1.00 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 16.693% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient | 13–6 | 0.00 | 8% | 28 Jun → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | -0.01 | 13% | 28 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 28 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–7 | 0.00 | 22% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.04 | 12% | 27 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.05 | 15% | 27 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | 0.03 | 13% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 16 May → | |
| vertigo | 13–6 | -0.03 | 14% | 16 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.02 | 14% | 16 May → | |
| inferno | 13–16 | -0.04 | 10% | 2 May → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.01 | 25% | 25 Apr → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.00 | 17% | 20 Apr → | |
| mirage | 14–16 | 0.01 | 13% | 20 Apr → | |
| inferno | 13–7 | -0.00 | 8% | 20 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 19 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.00 | 22% | 19 Apr → | |
| ancient | 12–16 | -0.04 | 14% | 19 Apr → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 19 Apr → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | 0.02 | 17% | 18 Apr → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 18 Apr → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 18 Apr → | |
| inferno | 13–10 | 0.02 | 15% | 18 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.10 | 22% | 18 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.07 | 10% | 13 Apr → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.07 | 16% | 13 Apr → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.01 | 10% | 13 Apr → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 12 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.00 | 18% | 6 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–9 | 0.01 | 27% | 6 Apr → | |
| inferno | 8–7 | -0.06 | 15% | 4 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.02 | 11% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.01 | 8% | 3 Apr → |
Match data via Leetify.