Hack

Hack — CS2 Stats

CA76561198302172755[U:1:341907027]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

139Tracked matches70%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22272 of 36059 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHackPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning64
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6238Last 10062%Win rateWLWLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim7.9
Aggression10.0
Utility1.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 50% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.4
Utility1.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time522ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — office 13–5
132Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 50% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1912763%0.01
mirageA1911858%0.05
cacheS1511473%0.02
infernoA138562%0.07
dust2S139469%0.03
ancientA95456%0.02
anubisB84450%0.01
office31233%0.05
vertigo110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
53%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
80.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1100%0.7512.0
Vertigo1100%2.0028.0
Ancient1100%0.9623.0
Anubis10%0.8624.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
522msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
67.0%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
1.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2515 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0313%30 Aug
mirage6–130.036%29 Aug
inferno16–130.0611%29 Aug
ancient6–130.0312%29 Aug
nuke13–60.0414%29 Aug
nuke13–110.0422%29 Aug
ancient9–130.0322%29 Aug
cache13–10-0.0118%29 Aug
inferno5–130.0110%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0116%28 Aug
anubis13–70.0012%28 Aug
dust213–4-0.0318%28 Aug
nuke6–40.1255%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0914%28 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0416%28 Aug
dust210–2-0.028%28 Aug
inferno7–30.063%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0316%28 Aug
inferno13–100.0311%28 Aug
dust29–4-0.027%27 Aug
ancient13–70.059%26 Aug
nuke13–100.049%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0815%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0119%26 Aug
ancient13–70.0123%26 Aug
nuke16–120.0116%25 Aug
dust214–160.0817%25 Aug
cache13–40.1615%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0619%25 Aug
dust211–130.0121%25 Aug
anubis13–80.0312%25 Aug
inferno13–60.1418%24 Aug
anubis17–19-0.039%19 Aug
mirage13–100.063%18 Aug
anubis7–130.0519%14 Aug
nuke8–130.0117%12 Aug
inferno13–30.0815%12 Aug
cache13–9-0.019%12 Aug
vertigo13–100.0616%11 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0314%10 Aug
mirage3–13-0.106%8 Aug
ancient13–50.0510%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0213%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0413%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0918%8 Aug
inferno13–30.0821%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.039%8 Aug
mirage2–8-0.0316%7 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0120%7 Aug
cache13–70.0116%7 Aug
office10–13-0.0614%6 Aug
cache14–160.0113%5 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0123%5 Aug
inferno9–130.1324%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0622%4 Aug
mirage13–20.0321%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0123%3 Aug
dust210–130.0011%30 Jul
dust26–130.0713%30 Jul
dust213–40.1116%30 Jul
mirage13–60.1313%29 Jul
office11–130.039%27 Jul
inferno10–130.119%27 Jul
office13–50.194%24 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0210%20 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0324%19 Jul
anubis11–130.0918%19 Jul
mirage13–60.1225%19 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0018%18 Jul
nuke7–130.0516%18 Jul
cache13–7-0.0415%18 Jul
cache13–70.1115%17 Jul
inferno16–140.0514%17 Jul
dust213–100.0723%17 Jul
cache13–70.0043%17 Jul
dust213–110.0621%16 Jul
mirage13–110.0714%15 Jul
inferno6–130.0331%14 Jul
cache12–160.0113%13 Jul
nuke13–9-0.008%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0110%13 Jul
dust213–70.035%12 Jul
ancient11–130.057%12 Jul
cache5–130.017%12 Jul
cache4–130.0140%11 Jul
cache13–20.0223%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0213%10 Jul
dust213–110.0521%9 Jul
cache13–9-0.0915%6 Jul
cache13–40.0814%6 Jul
cache13–100.008%6 Jul
mirage13–70.1511%5 Jul
nuke14–16-0.079%5 Jul
nuke13–30.0616%2 Jul
anubis13–40.0122%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.004%26 Jun
nuke1–13-0.115%26 Jun
dust213–40.034%26 Jun
mirage9–130.115%25 Jun
nuke13–20.055%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →