Tate

Tate — CS2 Stats

US76561198288478080[U:1:328212352]Steam profile ↗

1,658Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,332Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 Solid
Premier CS Rating19,999Purple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11632 of 27785 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,171 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.4%44.9%46.2%meets
Shot accuracy9.7%11.8%12.5%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.041.060.06 short
Match win rate47.0%45.3%45.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTateFACEITLevel 6 · 1,171 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression6.2
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time669ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.00
infernoB24131154%-0.01
dust2A22121055%-0.03
cacheA74357%-0.02
ancientB63350%-0.00
anubisC52340%0.00
nukeA53260%0.02
overpass32167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,578Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,348Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
45.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
9.7%Shot accuracy
7,533MVPs
1,332Hours (in match)
3,437Bombs planted
795Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,737
AWP5,200
P903,398
XM10141,738
SG 5531,455
MP91,410

Lifetime map wins

6,820dust2
4,323inferno
4,217nuke
1,691vertigo
694office
514train
207cbble
14lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
54%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
89.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4963%1.2216.4
Dust22548%1.1917.4
Ancient2035%0.9616.3
Inferno1872%1.0214.8
Anubis1747%1.0815.7
Nuke1650%1.0515.8
Vertigo1050%1.3517.9
Train3100%1.1021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
663msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.51HE damage / grenade
7.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.0799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0115%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0022%26 Aug
mirage14–160.0131%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0124%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.0325%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0714%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.0532%3 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0711%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0419%27 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0721%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.0520%24 Jul
ancient13–30.0524%24 Jul
cache13–30.0123%24 Jul
inferno13–70.0116%24 Jul
cache13–30.0517%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0126%23 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0426%23 Jul
mirage13–70.0314%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0114%22 Jul
dust213–40.0312%22 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0517%20 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1112%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0416%17 Jul
dust213–70.0629%16 Jul
inferno13–80.0718%13 Jul
inferno4–13-0.1121%7 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0424%7 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0714%7 Jul
dust213–4-0.1025%7 Jul
dust210–4-0.0713%7 Jul
overpass13–70.0128%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0317%5 Jul
inferno13–90.0116%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0512%5 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0320%5 Jul
dust26–13-0.0815%5 Jul
nuke14–160.0318%5 Jul
inferno13–40.0424%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0222%28 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0225%28 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0422%28 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0029%28 Jun
mirage6–130.0920%21 Jun
anubis16–190.0614%21 Jun
dust29–130.0213%21 Jun
mirage13–40.0623%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0526%16 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0515%15 Jun
dust23–13-0.0913%15 Jun
mirage8–130.0022%5 Jun
dust216–13-0.0323%4 Jun
mirage13–40.0426%3 Jun
inferno13–60.0822%2 Jun
inferno13–110.0328%2 Jun
inferno13–110.0416%1 Jun
mirage13–40.1019%1 Jun
cache5–13-0.0516%1 Jun
anubis13–80.0622%31 May
inferno13–160.0120%31 May
nuke13–60.0832%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0413%27 May
dust213–9-0.0219%27 May
dust213–30.0625%27 May
dust213–100.0525%27 May
ancient13–80.0231%27 May
mirage13–11-0.0115%18 May
mirage11–130.0021%17 May
cache13–80.0214%12 May
inferno5–13-0.0716%3 Mar
mirage9–130.0413%3 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0013%3 Mar
mirage13–7-0.059%3 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0616%2 Mar
dust213–3-0.0723%2 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0221%2 Mar
inferno11–130.0125%2 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0722%2 Mar
dust213–90.0912%2 Mar
dust27–13-0.1112%2 Mar
mirage13–90.0421%24 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0221%24 Feb
dust213–16-0.0213%24 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0517%24 Feb
mirage13–70.0115%24 Feb
overpass13–40.0217%24 Feb
inferno13–80.0324%24 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0519%24 Feb
dust28–13-0.086%23 Feb
dust27–13-0.0813%23 Feb
dust213–8-0.0127%23 Feb
dust24–13-0.0713%23 Feb
dust213–10.0229%23 Feb
mirage13–80.0227%23 Feb
mirage13–10.015%23 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0423%23 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0419%18 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0217%17 Feb
ancient13–100.0020%17 Feb
inferno13–60.0514%17 Feb
nuke13–50.0315%16 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →