Matter — CS2 Stats

76561198284456152[U:1:324190424]

805Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
752Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,529Purple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6195 of 12799 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMatterFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,529 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateWLLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression2.8
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%-0.02
ancientS1812667%-0.01
nukeB189950%0.00
anubisB126650%0.01
infernoC83538%0.00
dust2A74357%-0.02
overpassA53260%0.01
cache41325%0.01
train42250%-0.01
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

2,156,379Lifetime kills
32.71K/D · Top 1% of tracked players
2,254Matches
44.7%Match win rate
85.3%Headshot % · Top 1% of tracked players
40.7%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of tracked players
3,537MVPs
752Hours (in match)
1,816Bombs planted
455Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-471,257,318
Knife115,216
AWP63,089
Galil AR56,321
SSG 0830,329
Sawed-Off21,810
Tec-921,464

Lifetime map wins

3,278nuke
1,762dust2
1,581inferno
829vertigo
444train
64office
31italy
12cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
83.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
44%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%1.0214.0
Ancient1540%0.8914.1
Anubis1354%1.0616.9
Nuke1136%1.0315.2
Inferno580%1.4918.8
Vertigo4100%1.3118.8
Overpass10%0.6511.0
Dust21100%0.649.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
630msReaction time
19.1%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
7.79HE damage / grenade
8.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.0694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0211%2 Jul
anubis9–130.0220%21 Jun
ancient4–130.0110%21 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0119%17 Jun
inferno9–13-0.079%17 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0123%17 Jun
cache11–130.0120%17 Jun
mirage14–160.039%16 Jun
inferno13–60.0918%15 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0224%8 Jun
ancient16–120.0827%5 Jun
mirage13–60.1020%5 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0330%2 Jun
overpass11–60.0217%1 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0816%1 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0021%1 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0523%1 Jun
mirage16–130.0418%1 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0517%31 May
inferno8–130.0112%31 May
ancient14–16-0.028%31 May
anubis13–11-0.0116%31 May
overpass13–40.0527%31 May
train8–13-0.0330%31 May
ancient13–10-0.0221%31 May
train9–13-0.0929%31 May
nuke10–13-0.0825%31 May
mirage5–130.0415%31 May
ancient6–13-0.0710%31 May
mirage13–4-0.0615%30 May
nuke13–90.008%30 May
anubis9–13-0.0516%30 May
anubis13–16-0.0413%30 May
inferno9–50.0319%30 May
dust21–10-0.1121%30 May
anubis13–6-0.0142%30 May
nuke13–50.0138%30 May
ancient13–110.018%30 May
ancient13–10-0.0518%30 May
mirage10–130.0124%30 May
mirage4–13-0.0320%30 May
anubis7–13-0.0018%30 May
ancient13–11-0.0217%30 May
inferno7–13-0.0423%28 May
dust213–40.0023%28 May
ancient13–30.0020%28 May
nuke13–110.0223%28 May
dust215–15-0.0121%28 May
mirage13–11-0.0721%28 May
nuke13–10-0.0324%28 May
inferno13–90.0119%28 May
mirage13–20.0314%28 May
overpass5–13-0.0615%28 May
nuke13–20.1527%28 May
anubis6–130.0531%24 May
mirage13–10-0.0415%24 May
mirage5–13-0.0814%23 May
ancient13–110.004%23 May
mirage7–13-0.0616%23 May
nuke12–120.0131%23 May
mirage10–13-0.0423%23 May
nuke10–130.0222%18 May
vertigo13–11-0.0224%18 May
anubis13–50.1119%18 May
anubis13–50.0730%18 May
nuke7–2-0.000%17 May
cache10–130.0033%17 May
train13–100.0421%17 May
overpass9–130.0517%17 May
nuke6–13-0.0428%17 May
dust22–13-0.0716%17 May
ancient13–30.1323%17 May
nuke8–13-0.0323%17 May
cache13–5-0.0215%17 May
cache11–130.048%17 May
nuke9–13-0.0123%17 May
mirage12–12-0.0624%17 May
anubis8–13-0.0420%16 May
nuke10–130.0722%16 May
ancient13–9-0.0612%16 May
mirage13–4-0.0019%16 May
nuke13–50.0826%16 May
dust213–40.0148%16 May
mirage13–90.0128%16 May
overpass16–120.0021%16 May
inferno9–13-0.0017%15 May
ancient6–13-0.0319%15 May
mirage13–60.0216%15 May
dust213–80.0421%15 May
mirage12–12-0.0521%15 May
mirage13–10-0.0216%15 May
ancient8–13-0.0118%15 May
anubis13–8-0.0224%15 May
ancient5–10.0113%15 May
mirage10–13-0.0433%15 May
mirage8–13-0.0615%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0517%14 May
ancient13–30.0011%10 May
inferno10–13-0.0222%10 May
train13–110.0413%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →