S4ilingTurtle — CS2 Stats

76561198275620656[U:1:315354928]

143Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,229Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating9,178Light Blue band · top ~58.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20832 of 28103 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate42.1%40.1%41.7%meets
Shot accuracy19.0%7.6%8.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.060.920.97above
Match win rate40.8%42.2%43.8%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGS4ilingTurtlePREMIER9,178 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning53
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44497Last 10044%Win rateWTWTLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression8.9
Utility5.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time614ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — nuke
3Longest win streak
33In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB64303447%-0.00
dust2D1541127%-0.00
nukeS86275%0.02
infernoD51420%-0.02
overpass41325%0.01
ancient32167%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,741Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 25% of Light Blue band
3,138Matches
40.8%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
19.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Light Blue band
8,988MVPs
1,229Hours (in match)
2,869Bombs planted
714Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,950lake
1,808dust2
1,268inferno
1,066train
372nuke
338vertigo
115cbble
23office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.9%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
603msReaction time
49.0%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
11.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10.040%14 Jul
inferno12–120.0212%14 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0511%1 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0615%18 Jun
dust212–16-0.0114%9 Apr
ancient6–130.0218%8 Apr
mirage13–90.1029%7 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0318%1 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0815%1 Apr
mirage9–130.1021%29 Mar
nuke13–90.1018%28 Mar
mirage13–30.1320%27 Mar
mirage13–90.0310%27 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0011%25 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0212%25 Mar
mirage13–80.0824%25 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0220%20 Mar
dust23–13-0.015%18 Mar
mirage12–120.0334%18 Mar
mirage6–130.0124%18 Mar
mirage0–6-0.0114%18 Mar
mirage13–60.1019%18 Mar
dust29–13-0.0021%17 Mar
mirage10–130.0228%17 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0838%17 Mar
inferno12–16-0.0617%13 Mar
mirage8–130.0124%13 Mar
nuke13–100.0422%6 Mar
overpass8–130.0011%6 Mar
dust28–13-0.034%6 Mar
mirage13–90.0318%5 Mar
dust212–16-0.0328%5 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0030%28 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0329%10 Feb
dust213–160.0529%10 Feb
dust213–50.0425%10 Feb
mirage13–90.0120%9 Feb
mirage1–13-0.1013%8 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0125%8 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0124%5 Feb
mirage11–130.0336%5 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0129%5 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0026%4 Feb
mirage13–80.0923%4 Feb
dust213–7-0.0241%4 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0723%4 Feb
overpass9–130.0516%4 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0429%4 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0111%4 Feb
mirage13–11-0.078%3 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0420%2 Feb
mirage13–20.0163%1 Feb
nuke13–60.0317%31 Jan
mirage15–150.1223%31 Jan
mirage10–130.1329%31 Jan
mirage12–120.0414%31 Jan
mirage9–130.0217%31 Jan
mirage10–130.0420%30 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0517%30 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0411%30 Jan
dust25–130.0432%30 Jan
mirage13–100.0315%30 Jan
dust29–130.0238%26 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0114%13 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0220%12 Jan
dust210–13-0.0616%20 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0327%25 Aug
dust215–150.0540%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0516%22 Aug
overpass13–70.0825%22 Aug
dust21–13-0.099%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0310%7 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0322%7 Aug
overpass8–13-0.1015%6 Aug
ancient13–90.0718%3 Aug
dust213–2-0.0410%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0223%24 Jul
inferno4–13-0.017%23 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0441%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0321%6 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0831%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0319%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0816%26 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0714%25 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0517%19 Jun
mirage2–130.0130%18 Jun
nuke9–13-0.043%14 Jun
dust213–30.0622%1 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0421%30 May
vertigo7–13-0.0416%26 May
mirage13–90.0517%19 May
mirage13–8-0.0118%16 May
mirage11–13-0.0426%20 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0313%20 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0524%20 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0318%4 Apr
mirage13–70.0224%4 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0219%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.029%5 Feb
mirage13–50.0713%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →