McLasse69 — CS2 Stats

76561198259344322[U:1:299078594]✓ No bans

731Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,888Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.6%52.8%3.2% short
Shot accuracy19.7%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.08meets
Match win rate46.0%49.2%3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMcLasse69FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning46
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51454Last 10051%Win rateWLWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression4.9
Utility4.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time648ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–9
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.04
overpassB158753%0.05
nukeA138562%0.02
infernoD124833%0.01
anubisA117464%0.04
ancientC73443%0.01
vertigoA53260%0.02
train42250%0.03
dust231233%0.04
cache1010%0.02
office1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

156,225Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
6,926Matches
46.0%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
19.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
27,637MVPs
3,049Hours (in match)
8,645Bombs planted
3,214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,049
AWP18,351
UMP-453,630
P2503,472
Knife2,345
FAMAS2,242

Lifetime map wins

8,477inferno
4,071dust2
3,409train
2,405nuke
1,784vertigo
1,468cbble
137lake
123shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,131Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
70.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage650%1.1112.7
Inferno333%1.1617.7
Anubis367%1.1815.0
Ancient367%0.6713.7
Nuke3100%1.2513.3
Overpass2100%1.5420.0
Dust220%1.1417.0
Cache10%0.8511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
631msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0422%29 Jun
inferno7–130.0422%29 Jun
anubis13–100.0923%29 Jun
nuke13–40.0732%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0220%29 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0228%28 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0024%23 Jun
cache7–130.0236%17 Jun
mirage8–130.0627%17 Jun
overpass13–70.0325%26 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0430%26 Apr
anubis13–110.0518%23 Mar
mirage13–80.0920%6 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0726%29 Nov
mirage13–110.0624%29 Nov
inferno5–13-0.0335%21 Nov
ancient13–160.0832%21 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0321%20 Nov
overpass4–13-0.0717%10 Nov
nuke16–140.0126%10 Nov
overpass13–30.1221%8 Nov
mirage15–150.0920%8 Nov
mirage2–130.0023%26 Oct
mirage10–130.0116%14 Oct
nuke8–13-0.0614%13 Oct
mirage11–7-0.0131%13 Oct
overpass13–50.0526%13 Oct
nuke13–40.0712%13 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0213%11 Oct
ancient7–130.0130%11 Oct
train4–70.0330%11 Oct
inferno8–130.0726%10 Oct
overpass10–130.0034%10 Oct
mirage16–130.0634%27 Sept
overpass11–130.0424%20 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0016%19 Jul
inferno1–130.0123%19 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0313%18 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0326%15 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0032%15 Jul
overpass12–120.0531%15 Jul
mirage12–120.0430%4 Jul
anubis13–100.1422%25 Jun
anubis13–20.1036%25 Jun
vertigo9–130.0219%24 Jun
mirage13–90.0622%24 Jun
inferno13–80.0523%24 Jun
inferno0–6-0.0333%24 Jun
dust24–130.0237%15 Jun
nuke7–130.0020%9 Jun
dust213–80.0633%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0329%9 Jun
mirage8–130.0335%31 May
overpass6–130.0538%29 May
mirage13–30.0524%29 May
overpass13–100.0222%17 May
train3–130.0317%17 May
ancient4–13-0.050%15 May
mirage13–00.0013%15 May
ancient13–70.0320%15 May
ancient6–13-0.0525%12 May
anubis13–10-0.0333%12 May
inferno13–90.1238%8 Mar
anubis8–130.0717%21 Feb
overpass13–60.1622%21 Feb
overpass13–40.0622%14 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0019%14 Feb
overpass6–110.0419%8 Feb
nuke13–160.0136%8 Feb
ancient13–100.0524%8 Feb
nuke13–40.0532%8 Feb
inferno10–130.0126%8 Feb
dust29–130.0525%8 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0316%8 Feb
mirage13–60.1629%8 Feb
mirage13–90.2120%7 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0031%7 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0015%7 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0533%7 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0218%3 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0129%2 Feb
mirage4–130.0023%1 Feb
mirage16–130.0922%1 Feb
inferno13–70.0217%1 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0023%1 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0114%1 Feb
train13–90.0832%1 Feb
mirage13–50.0518%1 Feb
vertigo5–00.0729%1 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0317%1 Feb
vertigo13–10-0.0025%31 Jan
nuke13–20.1323%31 Jan
train13–9-0.0124%31 Jan
vertigo13–80.0429%31 Jan
office11–130.0321%31 Jan
anubis13–70.0524%31 Jan
mirage12–120.0522%31 Jan
overpass13–90.0826%31 Jan
mirage13–60.1028%31 Jan
overpass13–50.0811%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →