Erisumi — CS2 Stats
76561198247703238[U:1:287437510]
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 46 | 29–17 | 63% | 0.01 | |
| B | 30 | 14–16 | 47% | 0.01 | |
| S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | 0.04 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | -0.01 | |
| — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.01 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.02 | |
| office | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.09 |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.10 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.12 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 33 | 45% | 1.37 | 17.6 |
| Ancient | 31 | 68% | 1.56 | 21.8 |
| Nuke | 22 | 77% | 1.73 | 21.3 |
| Dust2 | 21 | 71% | 1.38 | 18.0 |
| Train | 10 | 60% | 1.35 | 21.2 |
| Overpass | 8 | 75% | 2.86 | 19.5 |
| Vertigo | 4 | 75% | 1.45 | 14.0 |
| Inferno | 2 | 0% | 1.22 | 18.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.3683 — below the 4 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3092% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
47% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–8 | 0.11 | 36% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 38% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 26% | 4 Jul → | ||
| office | 3–10 | -0.09 | 0% | 2 Jul → | |
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 32% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.06 | 36% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 27% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 41% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 36% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 47% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 15% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 39% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 35% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 30% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 33% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.03 | 30% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 47% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 74% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | -0.00 | 67% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 25% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.11 | 14% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 23% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.08 | 36% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 34% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 1–10 | -0.06 | 29% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 50% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 33% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 40% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.16 | 0% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.17 | 15% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 9–3 | -0.03 | 31% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.02 | 28% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.10 | 44% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 33% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 50% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 34% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 34% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.06 | 31% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 30% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 54% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 41% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.03 | 30% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 38% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.09 | 50% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.00 | 35% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 43% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.04 | 0% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 39% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.03 | 56% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 48% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.09 | 67% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 44% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 37% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 42% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–5 | 0.11 | 41% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 32% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 33% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 39% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 40% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 26% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 52% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 49% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.02 | 55% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.14 | 39% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 42% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.06 | 19% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.07 | 40% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 33% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 33% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.07 | 42% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 45% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 10–3 | 0.01 | 33% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 21% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 35% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 45% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 34% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 26% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 28% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.13 | 31% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.02 | 53% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 4–9 | 0.01 | 26% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.08 | 47% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 61% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 39% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.03 | 30% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 46% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 5–6 | -0.11 | 0% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.10 | 46% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.07 | 33% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 3–8 | -0.01 | 27% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.10 | 49% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.12 | 40% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.04 | 47% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.07 | 33% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 37% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 30% | 19 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.