charles

charles — CS2 Stats

76561198233777696[U:1:273511968]Steam profile ↗

1,306Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,765Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,245Purple band · top ~11.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8903 of 18407 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate61.9%48.1%above
Shot accuracy10.1%12.9%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.221.08above
Match win rate35.7%46.5%10.8% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcharlesPREMIER19,245 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression4.4
Utility6.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–9
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 17infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB21111052%0.01
dust2S1711665%0.02
nukeC146843%-0.02
ancientB137654%-0.01
mirageB136746%0.00
infernoC125742%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.00
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

149,907Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
5,846Matches
35.7%Match win rate
61.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
10.1%Shot accuracy
8,228MVPs
3,227Hours (in match)
5,533Bombs planted
1,502Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4789,771
AWP8,803
SSG 082,297
P2502,150
UMP-451,266
FAMAS1,235

Lifetime map wins

13,409dust2
4,067inferno
2,843nuke
1,076train
800vertigo
200cbble
39sugarcane
37office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
614msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
14.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9945% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0431%22 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0026%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0721%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0348%22 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0225%22 Aug
cache10–13-0.0219%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0526%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0420%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0224%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.097%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0018%19 Aug
nuke13–50.0627%19 Aug
cache10–130.0023%16 Aug
cache13–2-0.0121%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0622%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0426%15 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0511%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0922%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0118%15 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0921%13 Aug
dust213–90.0228%13 Aug
mirage13–40.0533%7 Aug
dust213–70.0529%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0125%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0022%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0130%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0217%6 Aug
anubis0–4-0.0850%6 Aug
cache10–13-0.0818%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0221%4 Aug
dust213–50.0618%4 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0021%3 Aug
cache13–8-0.0320%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0125%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0224%1 Aug
ancient13–70.0329%1 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0626%1 Aug
dust26–130.0516%1 Aug
cache13–90.0115%1 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0824%31 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0227%31 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0314%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0621%26 Jul
mirage4–130.0230%26 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0642%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0319%25 Jul
nuke2–130.0221%24 Jul
ancient13–10.0930%24 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0432%24 Jul
dust213–60.1030%23 Jul
mirage15–150.0834%21 Jul
cache13–90.0124%21 Jul
cache13–110.0232%20 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0216%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0517%19 Jul
dust213–40.1026%21 May
mirage7–00.0138%21 May
cache2–13-0.0232%21 May
nuke13–110.0227%13 May
ancient8–130.0228%13 May
inferno6–13-0.0120%13 May
cache3–13-0.0830%13 May
dust213–7-0.0331%12 May
dust25–13-0.0814%12 May
cache13–90.0420%10 May
cache3–130.0118%3 May
cache13–100.0656%3 May
nuke13–10-0.0130%2 May
cache13–100.0221%2 May
cache13–40.1023%1 May
anubis4–13-0.0126%30 Apr
cache8–130.0018%30 Apr
cache12–120.0427%30 Apr
inferno14–160.0728%29 Apr
cache13–30.1219%29 Apr
cache7–130.0622%29 Apr
cache13–3-0.0119%29 Apr
dust213–9-0.0120%19 Apr
dust213–90.1323%17 Apr
anubis13–50.0619%17 Apr
ancient6–13-0.069%17 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0418%17 Apr
mirage13–70.0322%16 Apr
dust213–100.0325%16 Apr
anubis13–70.0917%9 Apr
nuke13–10.0527%9 Apr
ancient13–110.0321%9 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0124%3 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0418%3 Apr
dust213–110.0426%3 Apr
overpass13–8-0.047%3 Apr
ancient13–80.0212%3 Apr
nuke7–13-0.058%2 Apr
anubis13–100.0017%2 Apr
dust215–15-0.0121%28 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0321%28 Mar
mirage8–10.0547%28 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0815%28 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0525%28 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0823%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →