Danoxorit — CS2 Stats

AT76561198215919473[U:1:255653745]Steam profile ↗

1,669Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,337Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,563Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10920 of 44134 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,805 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,563Peak Premier on CSDB

1,805Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,805
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 196 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 22,563
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,437 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	28.4%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	15.4%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.88	1.08
Match win rate	43.7%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning47

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression4.1

Utility4.8

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.7

Utility4.8

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time607ms−46ms

first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms

Headshot accuracy28.8%+3.8%

first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 28.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — ancient 10–4

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 28% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	-0.01
mirage	D	18	5–13	28%	-0.01
cache	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.01
inferno	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.01
ancient	A	14	9–5	64%	0.01
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
fachwerk	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

296,698Lifetime kills

1.88K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players

6,128Matches

43.7%Match win rate

28.4%Headshot %

15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

17,106MVPs

3,014Hours (in match)

6,947Bombs planted

3,021Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47141,152

M4A4 / M4A1-S28,122

AWP24,801

P2000 / USP-S24,003

Desert Eagle22,545

Glock-1814,058

AUG10,708

SG 5539,809

P2503,713

UMP-452,280

Lifetime map wins

18,427dust2

7,528inferno

2,136cbble

1,649nuke

1,325train

390vertigo

119office

60assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,310Matches

51%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

77.9ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	155	50%	1.19	16.5
Dust2	146	57%	1.18	16.2
Ancient	121	50%	1.07	15.9
Inferno	118	58%	1.23	16.4
Anubis	50	34%	1.08	16.1
Nuke	38	39%	1.10	16.5
Overpass	25	52%	1.07	14.7
Cache	12	42%	1.10	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.8%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.7%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

614msReaction time

20.5%T opening success

48.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

5.80HE damage / grenade

10.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.4532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–3	0.03	30%	23 Aug →
ancient	10–4	0.09	26%	23 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	55%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	23 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	26%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	34%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	18%	22 Aug →
inferno	7–2	-0.09	25%	22 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	9%	21 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	23%	21 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	25%	21 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.10	80%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	42%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	32%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	32%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–9	-0.06	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.07	35%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	32%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.06	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.02	27%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	50%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	21%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	21%	8 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	24%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	26%	4 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	28%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	31%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.07	19%	31 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	35%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	41%	27 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.04	16%	27 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.03	30%	26 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	40%	25 Jul →
fachwerk	11–13	-0.01	24%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	12%	25 Jul →
fachwerk	13–11	0.02	27%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	30%	25 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	25%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	26%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.04	15%	19 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.00	26%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	32%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	27%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	34%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	26%	18 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	26%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	24%	17 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	31%	17 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	35%	17 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	34%	17 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.08	0%	17 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	41%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.07	35%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	34%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.11	34%	12 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.06	28%	12 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	24%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.02	13%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	19%	11 Jul →
cache	7–2	0.02	44%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.00	31%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.03	27%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	25%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	27%	7 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	26%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	21%	5 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	18%	4 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	22%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	12%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	19%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	20%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	15%	3 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.08	20%	2 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	29%	2 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	39%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	30%	1 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.00	20%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	24%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	20%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	34%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	46%	29 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.00	15%	29 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	28%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.07	41%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.07	37%	25 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.01	24%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.01	45%	21 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.02	17%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.08	25%	21 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	11%	20 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	10%	20 Jun →
inferno	12–12	0.04	31%	18 Jun →