Nosy

Nosy — CS2 Stats

CA76561198212411513[U:1:252145785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

865Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
893Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,074Purple band · top ~20.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23189 of 43521 tracked
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate33.1%44.2%47.1%14.0% short
Shot accuracy13.1%11.6%12.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.080.13 short
Match win rate44.8%45.2%46.6%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNosyPREMIER17,074 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning53
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46468Last 10046%Win rateWWLLWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression6.0
Utility5.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time584ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–7
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB40192148%0.00
cacheB178947%0.02
dust2A117464%-0.00
nukeB115645%0.02
infernoD82625%-0.02
overpassD62433%-0.00
ancient41325%-0.02
anubis32167%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,667Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,034Matches
44.8%Match win rate
33.1%Headshot %
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
4,130MVPs
893Hours (in match)
2,119Bombs planted
500Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,293dust2
2,026inferno
1,052nuke
492vertigo
243train
154cbble
86office
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
581msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
5.72HE damage / grenade
7.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2451% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4731% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0121%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0015%8 Jun
dust214–16-0.1016%7 Jun
mirage11–13-0.026%7 Jun
anubis13–100.0414%7 Jun
mirage8–130.0318%7 Jun
nuke9–130.0211%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0011%7 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0223%7 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0013%7 Jun
nuke13–20.0813%7 Jun
ancient14–16-0.074%7 Jun
inferno14–160.0113%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0430%6 Jun
mirage13–50.014%6 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0617%5 Jun
inferno11–130.036%5 Jun
cache2–13-0.0417%4 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0514%3 Jun
dust213–9-0.019%3 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0511%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0113%31 May
mirage5–130.0420%31 May
inferno11–130.009%31 May
ancient6–13-0.089%31 May
mirage10–130.0312%31 May
mirage13–50.0214%31 May
mirage13–2-0.0110%31 May
mirage12–12-0.0210%30 May
mirage13–70.0616%30 May
cache13–2-0.0111%30 May
mirage11–13-0.0211%29 May
mirage11–13-0.0518%29 May
overpass4–13-0.0711%29 May
mirage6–13-0.068%29 May
cache13–90.0716%29 May
cache13–10-0.0211%28 May
mirage13–11-0.0510%28 May
cache7–130.078%27 May
mirage9–130.075%27 May
mirage12–120.0311%26 May
cache13–10.0510%26 May
cache10–130.0713%24 May
mirage15–15-0.0313%24 May
overpass10–13-0.023%24 May
ancient13–90.0316%24 May
mirage13–11-0.0310%23 May
nuke5–13-0.0015%23 May
anubis5–13-0.026%23 May
cache12–120.028%23 May
nuke13–110.0712%23 May
mirage13–50.0318%23 May
inferno14–16-0.0510%23 May
overpass13–100.0211%23 May
cache5–13-0.0517%22 May
mirage13–100.048%21 May
inferno13–11-0.035%18 May
nuke1–5-0.0818%18 May
mirage13–100.0718%18 May
cache13–70.1320%18 May
cache13–8-0.018%18 May
cache9–130.0115%18 May
mirage10–130.0112%18 May
dust213–10-0.0122%18 May
cache11–130.0310%11 May
cache4–130.025%11 May
inferno13–7-0.0310%11 May
inferno11–13-0.0412%10 May
nuke13–90.0316%4 May
cache13–60.0610%4 May
cache1–13-0.0411%4 May
cache13–90.0610%4 May
mirage13–110.0426%10 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0918%10 Apr
mirage13–110.0919%9 Apr
nuke16–140.0215%5 Apr
dust213–110.018%5 Apr
overpass13–70.0516%2 Apr
dust213–40.1015%2 Apr
mirage12–120.009%2 Apr
overpass0–70.005%2 Apr
mirage13–90.0515%2 Apr
nuke13–100.0621%2 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0414%2 Apr
dust27–130.039%1 Apr
ancient12–120.0413%1 Apr
mirage11–130.0012%1 Apr
mirage13–30.0719%31 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0416%31 Mar
dust211–13-0.035%23 Mar
mirage13–10.0625%23 Mar
nuke5–130.0015%23 Mar
dust215–15-0.047%23 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0126%20 Mar
anubis13–10-0.038%20 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0117%20 Mar
dust213–20.0615%20 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0515%20 Mar
mirage13–100.0322%20 Mar
mirage13–30.0414%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →