hocus sponkus — CS2 Stats

76561198211410985[U:1:251145257]✓ No bans

364Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,097Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,810Purple band · top ~25.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15001 of 24690 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate48.3%44.1%47.2%above
Shot accuracy14.6%11.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.201.031.09above
Match win rate46.8%45.2%46.6%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Pink band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhocus sponkusPREMIER15,810 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning54
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57394Last 10057%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression6.3
Utility6.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.9

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time539ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 13–4
131Biggest win — nuke
9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 21mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2116576%0.04
ancientC1881044%0.01
cacheS1711665%0.02
infernoB136746%0.03
mirageD103730%0.03
anubisC73443%-0.01
dust2S75271%0.06
train43175%0.03
overpass220100%0.11
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,176Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Purple band
1,411Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
48.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
3,213MVPs
584Hours (in match)
1,707Bombs planted
355Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,794nuke
1,783inferno
1,597dust2
512train
451cbble
201vertigo
75office
62safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
533msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
5.84HE damage / grenade
13.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0448% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.059%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.068%26 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0111%25 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0410%25 Aug
nuke13–50.1217%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0522%24 Aug
cache2–13-0.075%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0224%24 Aug
nuke13–40.0617%24 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0716%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0416%22 Aug
cache13–80.0416%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0217%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0221%21 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0419%20 Aug
cache10–130.0226%20 Aug
inferno6–130.0314%20 Aug
cache13–90.0317%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0224%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0613%19 Aug
cache13–80.0725%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.068%18 Aug
nuke13–70.1814%18 Aug
cache13–50.0821%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0115%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0732%18 Aug
train13–20.1021%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0521%18 Aug
anubis13–8-0.007%18 Aug
dust213–40.1519%16 Aug
train13–60.0322%16 Aug
mirage12–120.0519%16 Aug
nuke13–20.0520%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0236%16 Aug
nuke8–130.0312%15 Aug
ancient15–150.0112%15 Aug
inferno11–130.0419%14 Aug
dust213–80.0124%14 Aug
mirage6–130.0116%14 Aug
nuke16–130.0110%13 Aug
ancient13–90.1229%13 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0814%13 Aug
cache13–90.0530%13 Aug
train13–60.0532%13 Aug
nuke13–30.0617%13 Aug
vertigo0–6-0.0120%13 Aug
inferno13–60.0513%12 Aug
dust20–4-0.050%12 Aug
nuke12–120.0322%10 Aug
mirage13–40.2228%10 Aug
mirage2–00.1050%10 Aug
inferno13–30.1316%10 Aug
ancient13–60.1215%10 Aug
dust213–40.0521%10 Aug
cache13–110.0211%4 Aug
dust213–20.1019%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0323%4 Aug
mirage13–50.1416%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0620%3 Aug
train2–13-0.0528%3 Aug
overpass13–100.0428%2 Aug
nuke13–50.1918%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0230%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0323%22 Jul
nuke13–10.0623%22 Jul
cache8–10.0721%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%22 Jul
cache13–20.0528%22 Jul
nuke13–20.1324%22 Jul
anubis13–70.0017%22 Jul
nuke2–13-0.100%22 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0022%21 Jul
nuke16–120.0325%21 Jul
ancient8–20.1334%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0317%21 Jul
cache9–130.0430%21 Jul
inferno13–10.1623%20 Jul
overpass13–90.1811%20 Jul
cache13–10.0412%20 Jul
dust213–50.1918%20 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0018%20 Jul
cache4–13-0.0418%14 Jul
ancient13–60.0412%14 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0115%14 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0512%14 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0014%14 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0515%14 Jul
cache13–100.0616%14 Jul
inferno7–130.0221%14 Jul
cache2–13-0.0519%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0121%14 Jul
dust27–13-0.0513%13 Jul
cache13–100.0316%13 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0616%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.064%13 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0211%13 Jul
nuke13–110.0210%13 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0510%13 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0016%13 Jul
inferno13–50.0520%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →