nEXIOS — CS2 Stats

76561198208402003[U:1:248136275]Steam profile ↗

2,265Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

11,832Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating28,052Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#466 of 23380 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,780 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,007), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	79.5%	52.0%
Shot accuracy	18.9%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	0.96	1.08
Match win rate	47.4%	48.8%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning59

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression6.7

Utility4.7

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.9

Utility4.7

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time606ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy31.4%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 32.3% → last ⅓ avg 31.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	27	11–16	41%	0.02
cache	A	20	12–8	60%	0.01
dust2	B	19	9–10	47%	0.00
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	0.02
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.00
nuke	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

632,055Lifetime kills

0.96K/D

9,559Matches

47.4%Match win rate

79.5%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 10 players

18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 10 players

21,885MVPs

18,294Hours (in match)

9,429Bombs planted

1,793Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47423,996

M4A4 / M4A1-S62,768

P2000 / USP-S62,176

Desert Eagle37,786

AWP15,356

Glock-186,636

Knife3,783

P2502,655

UMP-452,132

Galil AR2,128

Lifetime map wins

11,210inferno

9,647dust2

3,856train

3,340cbble

2,464vertigo

1,927nuke

149office

42lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,057Matches

52%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

83.9ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	227	56%	1.25	18.0
Anubis	139	50%	1.23	17.5
Dust2	88	52%	1.17	16.6
Ancient	87	49%	1.18	17.6
Vertigo	47	47%	1.17	16.9
Cache	33	64%	1.45	20.6
Overpass	30	53%	1.21	20.0
Train	24	58%	1.43	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.2%Headshot accuracy

34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

88.0%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

578msReaction time

33.5%T opening success

47.4%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

8.68HE damage / grenade

8.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.4543% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	19–17	-0.00	39%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	36%	24 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	27%	24 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.09	24%	24 Aug →
cache	8–5	-0.02	33%	24 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	29%	22 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	38%	17 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	42%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	34%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	29%	11 Aug →
cache	2–3	-0.05	25%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	22%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	37%	7 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.05	29%	2 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	42%	1 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	27%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.12	26%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	17%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	35%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	33%	30 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	24%	30 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	41%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	43%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	24%	28 Jul →
cache	0–3	-0.00	67%	28 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	28%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	32%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	23%	28 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.04	26%	28 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	27%	27 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	24%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.08	31%	26 Jul →
cache	1–5	-0.00	20%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	42%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	31%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	29%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.08	29%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.03	30%	23 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	27%	23 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.01	39%	23 Jul →
anubis	1–13	0.02	41%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	43%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	29%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	25%	22 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.05	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	38%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	33%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.00	31%	17 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	29%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	17%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	27%	13 Jul →
anubis	3–0	-0.00	0%	13 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.05	35%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.09	39%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.09	33%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	36%	9 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.01	36%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	33%	8 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.08	28%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.03	36%	30 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	26%	30 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.02	35%	26 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	28%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.02	18%	26 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	29%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.00	22%	25 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	30%	24 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	37%	24 Jun →
nuke	0–13	-0.01	31%	23 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.00	34%	23 Jun →
mirage	16–19	-0.07	28%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.05	29%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	26%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.07	39%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.03	48%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.07	36%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.00	30%	21 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.01	46%	21 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.07	36%	13 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.11	44%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	54%	12 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.04	22%	12 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	22%	12 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.00	35%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.01	27%	12 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.07	22%	11 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.02	38%	11 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.01	31%	10 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	30%	10 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.02	35%	10 Jun →